Exhilaration is that feeling you get just after a great idea hits you, and just before you realize what’s wrong with it.
The man who insists upon seeing with perfect clearness before he decides, never decides.
-Henri Fredric Amiel-
It is not doing the thing we like to do, but liking the thing we have to do, that makes life blessed.
Nothing worse could happen to one than to be completely understood.
If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.
Great ideas need landing gear as well as wings.
I believe that genius is an infinite capacity for taking life by the scruff on the neck.
If you’re never scared or embarrassed or hurt, it means you never take any chances.
You can’t turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.
Originality is the art of concealing your source.
-Franklin P. Jones-
In matters of principle, stand like a rock, in matters of taste swim with the current.
Success is a journey, not a destination.
To live alone, one must be either an animal or a god.
If the doors of perception were cleansed, man would see everything as it is, infinite.
The moon is but a circumambulating aphrodisiac divinely subsidized to provoke the world into a rising birth rate.
Study is like the heaven’s glorious sun that will not be deep-searched with saucy looks.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
If while certain forms of self-disclosure can be a risky proposition because the reactions of others are not predictable, then living a double life can also be quite stressful since it prevents a person from achieving congruence between the public and the private self.
-De Monte Flores-Schultz-
I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
I see the world through the lens thyself, so the world is smeared if thy lens is dirty.
In past days I remember conversations I’ve held with friends about topics that held my attention. I once was instructed by a friend that there is no meaning when we ask the “why” questions about academic psychological inquiries. I understood the implications of this analysis, but the philosopher in me continues to ask the “why” questions even to this day. Mind you, this was back in the early nineteen-eighties when I was a psychology student and I seemed to question everything. I was thirsty for knowledge, and my studies directed me in paradigms that for me demanded further clarification. My friend whom had asserted his position was far more advanced in this field than I was, yet I seemed to be driven by a beat to a different drummer.
No matter what paradigmatic psychological school of thought you tend to follow, the basic questions I asked went beyond the psychological realm. Thus I entered into the realm of philosophy when I started to ask these types of questions. Even when I was a psychology student, the philosopher in me still thrived years before I decided to double my major in both disciplines.
I can’t really remember the exact topics at the time of this conversation, but I still remember the response of my friend to my questioning these matters that were of interest to me. Maybe this is the reason I decided to also major in Philosophy. Maybe this is also the beginning of the Skeptic in me.
Ironically I consider myself gravitating to the pragmatic philosophies of the world, yet I am still intrigued by many other differing types of philosophical thought. What stirs up a person to question their reality? Why do people become skeptical? Perhaps it is because they find conflicting information in what they see, read, and are told to believe as conditions they should except? Is it that there are fundamental issues with these assertions that contradict their notions of reliability?
However the rubber meets the road, we are still vaulted forward into discovery by our very nature of asking questions, and this is how many approach to learn about their world; by asking questions. I do not know all of the reasons that led me to become inquisitive. I only know that I am that way. I am not always inclined to act in this way, yet much of my being has an affinity with acting in this way.
There are many ancient skeptical schools of philosophy. Foundations of these schools come from India, Zen Buddhist, Chinese, and Greek schools, as well as the foundations from later Western schools of thought expressed by David Hume, René Descartes, and Immanuel Kant. I do not draw on these schools directly into their epistemological constructions as my form of skepticism is tied closer to matters associated with social pragmatic implications.
Doubt can be a useful tool. It is the basis for discovery into any assertion made. When we are told what to believe with little evidence, we can either accept it, challenge it, or dismiss it. I speak more of a way to diffuse opinion than to uncover the metaphysical and epistemological domains of human knowledge. You may think it is preposterous to live by such examinations, but sometimes it can help us achieve a better understanding of our place in this world.
I must say that before I knew anything about Skepticism, it was in my nature to ask these questions despite my intellectual foundations. Why did I ask them? Because I received information that somehow needed further explanation to understand it than to simply accept it as it was received. I was predisposed to question these types of questions. If we look further into my history, and we have demonstrated that it was not an intellectual awakening that summoned this spawn of thought, than where will we find the genesis of my disposition? Maybe the environment in which I was raised?
I was born into a family that did not quite understand the meaning of “intimacy.” The struggle to impart any kind of a healthy world view and skill of becoming a successful person in relationships, were not the best of what my parents could offer. My family had a difficult time just relating to one another my entire life, as with many families who face some of these intimacy issues. As I matured, I withdrew into my own perceptions and observations about the world as it unfolded. I was both the master and / or the slave upon which my beliefs conducted me into this brave new world. I sense that that my family’s interactive behavior had ultimately led me on a lifelong quest to find some answers to the questions that has perplexed so many of us from time to time. Due to the insatiable need that grew within me, questions began to emerge from a skepticism that was derived from the foundation of my family’s interactions and was conveyed through my own family experience. I have always loved my family and wanted closer connections, but my skills to achieve this were not yet formed.
I think this was the impetus of my approach to the world as I became the person known as me. The fundamental skeptical foundation that led me to question what I was told to see the world as it was by proxy of my family’s influence. Moreover, I did on my own accord because the information I was receiving was not satisfying my sense of the world. I had independent confirmation and differences of interpretation to how I encountered the world that was in direct conflict with what I was told. Thus the philosopher in me expressed itself into the world.
Today I am still questioning, I am still drawn to asking questions we are told about the world we live in, but not from my family’s input, rather it is from the world at large: the powers that be!
Clearly there has never been such a push for a dystopian era in past decades then our current situation worldwide. History has shown many such examples, yet we have not learned much from these as our push for a multicultural civilization is thrust upon us. Today I question multiculturalism which I argue is what globalist’s want to achieve as opposed to a multi-ethnic community that has indisputably existed around the world without massive inharmonious complications given one factor: that the multi-ethnic communities adopt the ethical foundations of the land such as the American experiment of governance among other Western Democracies.