Cognitive dissonance inside a lucid dream

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

Cognitive Dissonance Inside a Lucid Dream
A thought experiment from DCG
~
Close your eyes.
You are asleep. You are dreaming.
And you know it.
The walls are soft. The rules are gone. No one is watching. Nothing you do here will follow you into the morning.
Or will it?
~
In my waking life, I hold certain beliefs. I have written some of them down and numbered them. I call them life hacks.
They are simple. They are mine. I live by them, or I try to.
But what happens to a belief when you carry it into a place where it no longer seems to matter?
That is the thought experiment.
~
Life hack #1 says:
It’s easier to avoid temptation
Than it is to resist it.
Life hack #5 says:
The more you tell the truth
The easier it becomes.
Awake, these two live together in peace. One tells me to step away from temptation. The other tells me that what I repeat, I become.
Now take them into the dream.
In a lucid dream, temptation does not wait at a distance. It stands in front of me. I cannot walk away from the room, because I am the room. Avoiding it is no longer possible in the usual way.
So life hack #1 goes quiet.
And life hack #5 begins to whisper something darker. If telling the truth gets easier each time, then what about everything else I repeat? If I give in once in a dream, knowing it is a dream, does it get easier the second time? The third?
One belief says step away.
The other says you become what you rehearse.
In the dream, I cannot step away.
So what am I rehearsing?
~
Here is the question underneath all of it.
If I know it is only a dream, is there any penalty?
No one is harmed. Nothing is broken. I wake up and the world is exactly as I left it.
And yet, I chose. I was awake inside the sleep. I knew my beliefs, and I set them down, just to feel what it would be like.
Is that a sin?
Or is it only a picture of one?
~
The other life hacks do not stay silent either.
Life hack #2 asks what I would find if I looked into my own heart. What was the true intent behind the choice? In a lucid dream, intent is all there is.
Life hack #6 warns that avoiding, done as a habit, can leave you always lost. Is calling it “just a dream” its own kind of avoiding?
Life hack #7 says what we run from pursues us, and what we face transforms us. Was the dream a place where I faced something? Or a place where I ran toward it?
Life hack #8 says the strength of your faith and the error of your convictions will entangle. Is that not exactly what happens here? The belief and the betrayal, tied together in the same moment.
And life hack #10 reminds me that the water never changed. Only the room. If I am the water, does it matter what room I am poured into? Or does the water remember every room it has been in?
~
I do not have the answer.
I am not sure there is one.
But I keep coming back to a few simple questions.
If I would not do it awake, why do I want to do it asleep?
If it means nothing, why do I feel it?
If I do it once to know the feeling, will I do it again to keep the feeling?
And if a pattern forms in the place where no one sees, is it still only a dream?
Or is it a practice?
~
Maybe the dream is harmless.
Maybe it is a rehearsal.
Maybe it is a mirror, showing me what I would do if the consequences disappeared.
Maybe that is the most honest place I will ever stand.
~
Close your eyes again.
You are dreaming. You know it.
The temptation is right there.
What do you do?
And who are you when you wake up?
…
DCG

Life Hacks, #1 to #11

  1. Life hack #1: “It’s easier to avoid temptation / Then it is to resist it.” (unknown)
  2. Life hack #2: “If you can look into the heart / What would you find? / The true motivation / What you have behind the mind? / If we do not mark our path / With our true intent / What then guides us? / In our true consent?” (DCG)[thundergodblog]
  3. Life hack number three: “To heal a heart and soul / You must reveal the heart and soul / Always consider forgiveness / Only we control what we console.” (DCG)
  4. Life hack #4: “To forgive is not for the ‘sole sake’ of relieving another of their guilt, but rather for the ‘sake of the soul’ that had been perpetrated upon!” (DC Gunnersen)[thundergodblog]
  5. Life hack #5: “The more you tell the truth / The easier it becomes.” (DCG)
  6. Life hack #6: “Ignoring, or avoiding is a pernicious kind of sloth / If it becomes a habit / You might always be lost.” (DCG)
  7. Life hack #7: “What we run from pursues us / And what we face transforms us.” (unknown)[thundergodblog]
  8. Life hack #8: “The strength of your faith / And the error of your convictions will entangle.” (unknown)[thundergodblog]
  9. Life hack #9: “Be the reason / Someone has a better day.” (unknown)[thundergodblog]
  10. Life hack #10, “The Water Never Changed”: A bottle of water costs $1 at the corner store and $6 on a plane, but the water is the same. “Nothing about the water was ever the problem. / Only the room it was standing in.” Your worth doesn’t change with the setting.
  11. Life hack #11: “Every day, you have two choices: to focus on what’s wrong, or to embrace what’s right. Choose gratitude. Choose joy. Choose to see the beauty in the little things…” (anonymous)[thundergodblog]
    The post for #1 on the site is dated August 11, 2026, even though #2 is from October 2025. It may have been reposted.

My Hacks and the Dream Experiment
My question: if you know you’re dreaming and still choose to sin, does that corrupt you? My own hacks mostly say yes, but only a little. What matters is the choice you make while aware, not the fact that it happened in a dream.
• Awareness makes it a choice (#2, #8). In a normal dream, things just happen to you. In a lucid dream you’re aware, so choosing the act is an “intent” in the sense of #2. #8 fits too: your faith and the conviction you’re breaking get tangled together. That tangle is the cognitive dissonance i’m describing.
• Repetition builds habit (#1, #5, #6). #5 says truth gets easier the more you tell it. The reverse would also be true: an act gets easier the more you rehearse it. #6 says a repeated habit can leave you “always lost.” #1 says avoiding temptation is easier than resisting it. Practicing the act in a dream wears down the avoiding, so waking life would take more resisting.
• Running from it vs. facing it (#7). This hack leaves room for a different answer. If you use the dream to face a temptation and understand it, it could change you for the better. If you use it to indulge the temptation, it’s the thing you run from, and #7 says that pursues you.
• The counterweight (#3, #4, #10). #10 says the water never changed, only the room. A dream is just a different room, so your core self is still there. #3 and #4 say it can be fixed: be honest about it and forgive yourself. In their terms, that’s “reveal the heart” and “the sake of the soul.”
• #11 suggests a way to aim your lucidity: use your awareness to practice what’s right instead of what’s wrong.
A possible conclusion: a dream doesn’t corrupt you, but deliberately choosing something in a dream and doing it again and again can wear down a belief, the same way a waking habit does. My  hacks point to three stages:

  1. The dissonance: #8
  2. The wearing down through habit: #1, #5, #6
  3. The way back: #3, #4, #7, #10
    This connects to real research. People practice skills in lucid dreams, and imagined rehearsal can shape how you act. Dream ethics, including Augustine’s worries about what he did in dreams,

Is not our own thinking?

Sometimes placed under lock and key

Hidden from ourselves

And from others to see

— DCG 

Three classes shy 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

Three Classes Shy


Why do I walk the mesa late at night,
beneath the bell tower’s arch of sun-bleached stone?
Why does the old campus glow so bright
for one who walked away from it alone?
I left my home at seventeen, so young,
and paid my way with every dollar earned.
Who heard the quiet hope upon my tongue
each night I studied while the lamp still burned?
Why is there always one more class to find,
a room I cannot reach, a door that’s locked?
Why does the schedule blur inside my mind
while minutes slip away upon the clock?
Psychology, philosophy, two roads
I traveled far but never saw them end.
Three classes short. Who measures all the loads
a working heart must carry, lift, and tend?
I married, and I worked for forty-one
long years, and gave the best of what I had.
So why, when all those working days are done,
does one unfinished piece still make me sad?
Is this the reason that the dream returns?
Does painful truth play hide-and-seek at night,
and wait behind the library till it learns
I’m strong enough to face it in the light?
And if I face it, what else might I find?
That no diploma measures who I’ve grown?
That every lesson life has left behind
has taught me more than any class I’ve known?
The past is history, so let it be.
The future is a mystery, still unknown.
But now, this very moment, sets me free,
a gift we call the present, all our own.
So if a dream keeps calling you by name,
what hallway, what closed door, waits there for you?
Perhaps it doesn’t come to bring you shame,
but just to walk you home, whole, and new.

…

DCG

“If you don’t heal what hurt you, you’ll bleed on people who didn’t cut you.”

— unknown 

This was the dream. I woke up on the San Diego State University campus, wearing a very plush San Diego State letterman jacket, which I have owned in the past. I was surrounded by people, many of whom were from where I worked. The people I had my career with showed up throughout the dream, even though many of them did not attend San Diego State.
We were sectioned off, almost as if we had been told to serve the campus community for some unknown reason. We were grouped together in square formations, almost like attendance lineups, or even in classrooms. I walked around and saw people from my job. I didn’t know why they were there too, because many of them did not go to the same school I did.

This dream, in some form, keeps coming back: me on the campus of San Diego State University.

Transcription
“Here is the twist. I was three classes shy of getting my degrees at San Diego State University. One in psychology and one in philosophy.”
Annotation: the two degrees would have been a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy.
A Revelation
I left home at 17 and paid my own way through San Diego State University. I studied toward a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy while working full-time.
I always meant to finish. But marriage and work took priority, and I spent 41 years with my employer. I ended up three classes short of both degrees, and not finishing those classes is my biggest regret.
My education has always mattered deeply to me. That may be why the same dreams keep coming back. I think they may be my mind returning to the one important thing I never finished the way I wanted to. This isn’t a failure. It shows how much I still value what I worked so hard for.

I convalesce 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

In the sanitarium of my mind

I convalesce

Just what then will I epitomize?

Or, do I digress?

The mind is a curious domain

You can turn your attention inside

Discover the connections you’ve made

Then learn where the pit of your fears reside

Consider the invisible opérations

Disassociation or self defense

The subconscious training rituals

The impulse to build a fence

Observations from the playground

Internalized with limited objectivity

Often laid dormant or forgotten

In the shadows of obscurity

Is it really too much to ask?

How we descend upon humanity? 

How we treat each other and ourselves? 

The question in perpetuity 

Some say only knowing the reasons

Will not be enough

You must also be able to feel

Or your experience is just a bluff

The body holds its own accounting
A ledger written in the chest,
A tightness where the words fall silent,
A weight that will not let me rest


What wounds the most is often absent,
Not the blow, but what was never there,
The comfort missing from the doorway,
The empty space of unmet care


A child will trade away the feeling
To keep the bond that keeps him fed,
Authenticity for attachment,
A quiet bargain in his head.


So I learned to think instead of feeling,
To analyze and not to weep,
Assembled reason like a fortress,
And buried sorrow in the keep.


But thought without the heart is exile,
And feeling without thought, a flood;
The mind must learn to hear the body,
The pulse, the breath, the rush of blood.


So I return to meet the younger,
The one who stood beside the wall,
And name the ache he could not utter,
And answer, finally, his call.


To face the shadow is not surrender,
But gathering what was cast aside;
The anger I was taught to swallow
Becomes the strength I need not hide.


Responsibility becomes the medicine,
To carry what I did not choose,
To bear the load and find the meaning
Within the things I feared to lose.


Compassion, then, is not indulgence,
But curiosity made kind,
A question asked without a verdict,
A gentle light within the mind.


The fence I built becomes a garden,
With gates I open and I close;
Not every soul will find the entrance,
But those who do, the heart well knows.


So in the sanitarium of my mind,
I convalesce, but not alone;
The thinking and the feeling marry,
And I, at last, am coming home.

…

DCG

If every lock opened with every key, keys would become useless. People work the same way. You aren’t meant to connect with everyone. The people worth keeping are the ones your personality was meant to unlock. Because your job isn’t to open every door, it’s to find the ones you were made for.

— unknown 

Rented lives 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

Rented Lives


We never heard the danger come,
it wore the clothes of ease;
it did not break the door or knock,
it simply took the keys.
The young men learned to call it free,
the hours they slipped away;
but strength is not a thing you rent
and borrow back someday.
When life at last asks them to stand
and lift what they must bear,
they reach for will and find it spent,
already rented there.
The daughters learned to be a picture
before they learned to be;
it’s hard to hear your own soul speak
while watching what they see.
The husband builds and pays and mends,
he keeps the roof and wall;
but useful is not the same as known,
and no one finds him there at all.
The wife holds every heart but hers,
she shelters all from storm;
but somewhere in the holding up
she lost her own true form.
The driven build a bigger life
around the same old wound;
they call the square footage healing,
but the hurt just has more room.
The elders watch the world rush on
with wisdom no one sought;
the grave is not the thing they fear,
but mattering for naught.
And we, the rest, are entertained
right out of what we know,
informed right out of quiet peace,
and lulled from where to go.
This is the only life we have,
not rented, not on loan;
the danger is we’ll spend it all
and never make it home.

…

DCG

Transcript
A lot of people are hurting right now. That’s you. I think this is a must-listen.
So I said to ChatGPT: “I want you to act as a risk analyst. However, your job isn’t to predict the stock market or insurance claims. It’s much more important than that. You are a risk analyst for the human condition. You study what actually puts groups of people in danger before they realize they’re in danger. For each answer, I want you to present the single greatest hidden risk facing that group. I’m looking for the things underneath their habits, culture, technology, family roles, addictions, ambitions, and fears. Stay away from the obvious ones. Keep your responses short and sweet and make it land. Here we go.”
Q: What is putting young men most at risk right now?
A: They are being trained to confuse escape with freedom, so by the time life asks for strength, their willpower has already been rented out to pleasure.
Q: What is putting young women most at risk right now?
A: They’re being taught to become an image before they become a person, and it is hard to hear your own soul when you’re constantly watching yourself from the outside.
(Damn, I worry about that with my girl so much. Think about it all the time.)
Q: What is putting husbands most at risk right now?
A: They’re quietly becoming useful instead of intimate, then wondering why the house they provide for no longer feels like a place where anyone can find them.
(What a line.)
Q: What is putting wives most at risk right now?
A: They’re being asked to make everyone else feel held while slowly losing access to the version of themselves that also needs holding.
Q: What is the main risk for our most ambitious humans?
A: They’re mistaking expansion for escape, building bigger lives around the same wound, and calling the square footage healing.
(Wow. That’s America.)
Q: What is the biggest risk to our grandparents?
A: They’re watching the world move on without asking for their wisdom, and the deepest danger is not death, but the belief that their life has become commentary instead of contribution.
Q: Let’s distill this down to the everyday person, people like myself and those listening. What’s our biggest risk?
A: You are being entertained out of your instincts, informed out of your peace, and distracted out of the one life that is actually yours to live.
(All right, y’all, if you like these shorts, I am…) [clip ends]

— saggy says 


My Answers, Same Prompt
Young men: They’re being offered achievement without risk: games, porn and online rankings all feel like winning, so they never build the tolerance for real failure that turns a boy into someone others can lean on.
Young women: They’re learning to judge their lives by other people’s reactions, so they can be admired and still be unknown, sometimes even to themselves.
Husbands: They’re letting loneliness look like competence. Because they handle everything, they end up with no one they need and no one who knows they’re struggling.
Wives: They’re becoming the family’s memory and schedule, keeping track of everyone’s needs, until their own wants feel like just another item on the list.
The most ambitious: Each goal they reach becomes the minimum, so they’re never done. They gain time and money but lose the ability to feel that anything is enough.
Grandparents: They’re being made comfortable instead of needed. Being kept safe while no one asks anything of them slowly tells them their story is finished.
Everyday people: We react so constantly that we’ve stopped choosing. Hours pass on things we never decided to do, and a borrowed life can feel exactly like our own.

— perplexity 

When you live in the world of shadows 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

Why do I share my heart?

Why do I share my soul?

Why  do I find a psychological and philosophical language?

Does it have an Ostentatious toll? 

When will I find my peace? 

Is this the joke of reciprocity?

Do I walk the road to perdition ? 

Or will I give permission for my clemency?

Do I play the game of life?

Or does the game of life play me?

Knowledge is only half the answer 

Wisdom is when you clearly see ! 

I watched an episode of the twilight zone

Or was it an impression of reality?

How deep must I look?

What will be will be ! 

A lost soul may wander

I don’t rightly know

When you live in the world of shadows

To heal you must let it go 

I know the folk singer would say

I know he won’t rescind

“The answer my friend”

“Is blowing in the wind-the answer is blowing in the wind”

…

DCG

Am I  Channeling  Carl Jung

~ DC ~ Leave a comment


Am I Channeling Carl Jung?


Why do I keep returning to the door
I learned to fear before I learned my name?
What am I hoping to find beneath the floor?
Why does each poem go back there just the same?
Jung called it shadow: what we push away.
Is mine the anger I was taught to hide?
If I invite it in, what will it say?
And can I hear it without taking its side?
I wrote of learning silence in a house.
Did silence keep me safe, or leave me small?
Do I still go quiet as a mouse
When no one here is angry after all?
I wrote of wearing calmness like a coat.
Who taught me how to fasten every seam?
When hurt comes near, why do I clear my throat
And speak as though I’m safely in a dream?
Why does my pride arrive prepared for court
With every slight arranged to make its case?
What does it guard when it cuts kindness short?
What fear is hiding underneath its face?
I wrote that thought could make a fortress last.
Was learning then a shelter from the pain?
When I explain each detail of the past,
Why does my heart still walk into the rain?
I studied how a person comes to be,
The mind, the soul, the habits we repeat.
Did all those years of study help me see,
Or keep me from the feeling at my feet?
Jung listened for the parts a life concealed.
Do I keep hearing them beneath my page?
Is there a grief I’ve carefully not revealed,
Or fear I’ve called good sense for half an age?
Why do I read a silence as a sign?
Why do I search a face for coming rain?
Whose old voice sounds so much like mine
When I tell myself I must endure the pain?
What do I make of that boy on the field,
Still waiting for somebody to draw near?
What did he learn when no one asked him how he’d healed?
Why does his silence still live in me here?
I speak of love, then turn and guard the gate.
I ask for closeness, then prepare to flee.
Is this the shadow Jung asked us to face:
The frightened part I will not let be me?
And what of all the good I set aside?
The softer self I feared the world would bruise?
Is there a gentleness I learned to hide
Because I thought that I would have to choose?
Would Dostoevsky’s man beneath the ground
Know why I argue with myself at night?
Do I build proofs where no proof can be found
So I can say I’m right instead of frightened?
Why does this question follow all I write?
Has something pressed its shape into my soul?
If I can name the thing and bring it light,
Must I still feel it to become more whole?
I think of Maslow and the life I sought.
Is growing more than reaching some clear height?
If all I’ve done is learn to master thought,
Who holds the hurt I keep outside my sight?
Am I, like Jung, pursuing what I miss
When I mistake the mask for all I am?
Can I hold both the wound and joy in this,
And stop condemning one to save the man?
I almost sign this page, then change my mind.
Must I give strangers every private name?
Can I leave those I love and hurt behind
The curtain, yet speak plainly of my shame?
Can I ask the question without scorn?
Can I meet the boy and not demand his proof?
What part of me was waiting to be born
While I stood outside myself beneath the roof?
Please help me understand what’s going on inside.
Not just the story, but the ache beneath.
Can I sit with what I used to hide
And let a feeling pass without a speech?
I think I’m on a path that Jung once knew:
To meet the hidden self, not win a fight.
My steps are mine; his questions help me through.
Could I be growing whole by facing night?

…

DCG

“The most self-aware person in the room is often hiding the deepest pain.
People who were emotionally neglected as children become the biggest intellectualizers in therapy and the healing journey. They get stuck overanalyzing over and over, but terrified of feeling anything in their body.
They might walk into a therapist’s office and get told, ‘Wow, you’re so self-aware. Seems like you got it all figured out.’ But instead of relief and validation, they feel hollow instead, because what’s actually happening is a defense. It’s the suppression of the grief, the anger, the shame, the anxiety that never got to cycle through to actually release.
You see, a child’s first instinct when they are neglected is to cry out for help, to reach for connection. But when that call keeps getting ignored, they learn something else instead: that their cries don’t work. And so they go into the prison of their mind instead. They suppress the feeling, they disconnect, dissociate, and intellect becomes the only safe place left.
And it sure fools everyone, including themselves. But what’s underneath is a nervous system that actually collapsed. It’s the belief that feeling emotions puts them in a helpless and hopeless situation.
The intellectualization isn’t really making them smarter. It’s just trauma that’s still in control, and it costs them dearly: relationships that never really feel safe, a body that never gets to relax and loosen up, years—maybe even decades—understanding themselves so perfectly while nothing actually changes underneath.
But eventually, like all coping mechanisms, it starts to break at the seams: random bouts of crying, reactivity that they can’t explain, numbing out, avoiding hard conversations, or having hard conversations that immediately turn into explosions.
Now, if this is you and you want to get out of this, you have to go beyond the mind, and that’s a journey into the body, into the nervous system, into the parts that you never got to develop.
So one quick move that you can do the next time that feelings come up inside you is to place a hand—a soft hand—on where you notice it in your body. And there’s a lot of science backing this up now: just stay with it for at least 60 seconds and ride it out. Let the feeling happen. Short window, but big impact.
You might find out that you actually move through the feeling and get to the other side without having to suppress and overthink.
— mindfulness 

Serling Inspired  

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The solemnity of our grief 

The anguish in our eyes 

A crisis of conscience

The reason for our lies 

The misanthrope

The beguiled

The forsaken 

The destiny of a child

The false profits

The helrs of sophistry

A travesty within a tragedy -just ask Dostoevsky 

The cult of personality


An “underground man” can build a throne from fear,

Then call the throne his sight;

He shuts the door on what he hears,

And says the room is right.

He sees a wound in someone’s face

And thinks he knows its cause;

He puts his judgment in its place

And calls that judgment law.

The child grows up beneath that gaze,

And learns to hide the bruise;

He wears the mask his father made

Until he thinks he chose.

The liar fears the truth will burn

The last good thing he owns;

He cannot bear to look, or learn

Who suffers for his throne.

And what of us who stand nearby

And see the child grow still?

What truth have we refused to try,

What silence served our will?

Perhaps the hardest thing to face

Is not the liar’s claim,

But how we turn from someone’s pain

To keep a spotless name.

…

DCG

The anomalies of human reason 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The Argument From the Big Bag


We heard the world began in flame,
Then heard the flame was just a bag;
We blamed the stars, then named a name,
And waved our certainty like flag.
A man with fragments in his hand
Can build a kingdom out of dust;
He calls the missing pieces “planned,”
Then asks the crowd to share his trust.
He sees one photograph go wrong,
And ghosts are clearing banks by night;
A rumor learns a marching song,
And every loud voice makes it right.
We take a fact, remove its bone,
Then dress the skeleton in pride;
The part we cannot quite have known
Becomes the truth we won’t divide.
The man who cannot spell the case
Explains the court, the law, the crime;
He puts a solemn mask in place
And makes confusion sound sublime.
A screen declares the danger near,
A slogan gives the panic shape;
We pass the borrowed dread and fear
As if a share were an escape.
In politics, the bags go bang,
The ghosts endorse the candidate;
Each tribal bell begins to clang,
While facts are kept outside the gate.
We call it research, call it sense,
Call every doubt a bought-out lie;
Then build a fence around the fence
And praise the walls we cannot see by.
Perhaps the wiser mind would pause,
And leave one question unapproved:
Not every noise becomes a cause,
Not every claim is therefore proved.

…

DCG

Philomena Cunk: You heard of DNA?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Yes.
Philomena Cunk: Do we all have DNA, or does some of us have D or A but not both?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: No, it’s not D and A. It’s three letters: DNA.
Philomena Cunk: Can you tell by looking at me whether I have DNA?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Well, I know you have DNA because you’re a living organism, and all life has DNA.
Philomena Cunk: My mate Paul tried to create a new life form by inserting his DNA into a grapefruit. But halfway through the experiment, the greengrocer started hitting him. Why is science so controversial?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Sorry, that question didn’t follow from your story of the—
Philomena Cunk: No, it changed, yeah.
Philomena Cunk: Should we move on to more hardcore scientific stuff? Okay, so: ghosts. When a human body dies, which hole does the ghost come out of—north or south?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: I don’t regard ghosts as a hard scientific subject, I’m afraid.
Philomena Cunk: Let me tell you something: don’t dismiss it. In 2021, my Aunt Carol got engaged to a man called Bob Collins. But one day, he just vanished and cleared out a bank account. And when she looked up the name Bob Collins, she discovered he died in 1958. He’d been a ghost all along.
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Could he not just have been someone impersonating Bob Collins?
Philomena Cunk: No, no. There were photos of Bob Collins in 1958 and he looked totally different, which proves he’d disguised himself so she wouldn’t know he was a ghost. You can’t explain it, can you? It’s terrifying.
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Isn’t the easy answer that he doesn’t look like him because it’s a different person altogether?
Philomena Cunk: No, it’s a ghost. Why do people say the universe came out of a big bag?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: I think you mean “Big Bang.”
Philomena Cunk: A big bag that went bang.
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: No, no. Just a big bang—no bag.
Philomena Cunk: Has anyone ever claimed responsibility for the Big Bang?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: It just happened.
Philomena Cunk: So we’re no nearer finding a culprit. What’s the point of atoms? You know, do we really need them, or could we just do without?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: We do really need them because we’re made of atoms. Everything in the world is made of atoms, so without them we wouldn’t be here.
Philomena Cunk: Are our eyes made of atoms?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Yes.
Philomena Cunk: Because my mate Paul did ketamine once and he said he started counting all the atoms in his eyes. Then he tried to eat a towel and he ended up in hospital.
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Okay.
Philomena Cunk: Are our feet made of atoms?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Yes. I mean, I could save you the bother by saying everything—all stuff—is made of atoms.
Philomena Cunk: Are our thoughts made of atoms?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: Well, no—well, no, thoughts are—
Philomena Cunk: Well, there you go then. Okay, that’s all. Okay. People worry a lot about AI. What about you?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: You mean, am I worried about—
Philomena Cunk: No, I mean should they worry about you?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: I hope not. I hope not. I mean, people are worried about artificial intelligence because they think maybe one day it’ll replace us human beings. I’m a human being. Why should they be worried about me?
Philomena Cunk: No, no, no—the letter U. They’re all vowels, aren’t they? A, I, U. What does the U in AI stand for?
Professor Jim Al-Khalili: There isn’t a U in AI.
Philomena Cunk: So it’s a secret, then. The computer’s hidden it.
Philomena Cunk: Have you ever stopped to wonder about how you could watch more of this sort of thing? You know, more hard-hitting questions, and more standing near impressive locations before the shot cuts away to some archive of stuff that doesn’t exist anymore, or was too expensive to film up. Well, there’s more on BBC iPlayer, apparently. Do I get paid extra for that?

—Philomena Cunk (Diane Morgan) interviews theoretical physicist Professor Jim Al-Khalili in Cunk on Life (BBC, 2025).

The boy in the doorway

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

An announcer voice opens the show as “The Thunder God Radio Hour,” introduces the title and author, and calls out each chapter break the way a 1940s serial would.

The hand within 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The Hand Within


A glove lies quiet, shaped like a hand,
Its fingers waiting in the dust.
It holds the likeness of a plan,
Yet cannot move, cannot be trust.
It may be sewn with careful thread,
And keep the outline plain and true.
But cloth alone is stillness, dead,
Until a living hand comes through.
So are we formed with face and name,
With open palms and waking eyes.
We bear a shape beyond our frame,
A question under all our skies.
Some call it God, some call it breath,
Some name the light that makes us whole.
Yet every heart has known a death—
The hush that settles on the soul.
We walk through days of work and noise,
We grasp, we give, we lose, we find.
But purpose is a deeper voice,
A hand that moves within the mind.
The glove is not ashamed of need,
Nor is the hand too proud to dwell.
Together, they can serve and lead;
Apart, each tells a quieter tale.
So let us hold our questions near,
With gentleness for every way.
And leave a little room for fear
To open slowly into day.
For what we are is more than form:
A waiting shape, a breath, a plea—
A hand in glove, made whole and warm,
When love becomes the life in me.

…

DCG

Speaker A: Watch how she beautifully explains this concept.
Speaker B: Yeah, that makes sense. So, am I spiritually dead, you think? Like, I’m going to hell, you think?
Speaker A: Well, let me explain it in a way that really helped me kind of understand the spiritually dead thing. So, a glove was made in the image of a hand, right? The five fingers, so that a hand can fit inside the glove. And with the hand, the glove is useful. You can use it and it has a purpose. But without the hand, the glove is lifeless. That make sense?
Speaker B: Surprisingly, it does.
Speaker A: Okay, so track with me. In the same way, we were created in the image of God, right? So that God can live inside of us. And with God, we have purpose. We’re filled with His power, we’re filled with His strength, but without God, we’re spiritually dead. Does that make sense?
Speaker B: I think it does, surprisingly. So, you’re saying I was made in the image of God so that God can live inside of me and give me purpose.
Speaker A: Exactly, yeah.
Speaker B: I don’t think I’ve ever heard somebody break it down like that before.

–
Likely source

• “Lifeless Glove = Spiritually Dead” — YouTube, posted September 11, 2025. Its indexed description attributes the presentation to Joanna Jewell and explicitly identifies the same glove analogy about spiritual deadness, God, and purpose.