A house can hold four walls and still be empty inside, where a child grows up starving on a diet of “not now,” love arrives late, or wearing a disguise, and the wound gets planted before anyone knows how. Kohut called it a disease of deficiency, plain and clear, not evil born whole, but hunger dressed as pride, a mirror shattered so many times it learned to disappear, swallowing the child’s own reflection, pushed aside. Every child needs to be seen before they’re told they’re wrong, to be held in eyes that actually want to stay, but disconnection hums a quieter, colder song, and misunderstanding becomes the only language they can play. Somewhere a parent needed a child to complete a broken plan, to fill the hollow where their own dreams used to be, and the child became a burden they never meant to withstand, paying rent on a life they didn’t choose to see. So the small self folded inward, quiet as a closing door, building walls where open arms were supposed to grow, self-orientation became armor, nothing more, a fortress built from all the love they didn’t get to know. Every unanswered cry writes a sentence in the bone, hurt and rejection learn to wear a familiar face, abandonment feels less like an event and more like home, misunderstood becomes the only inherited place. “I don’t need anyone” becomes the armor for the ache, dissociation lets the mind quietly leave the room, shame moves in like water finding every crack to make, and independence is just fear, dressed up to bloom. The child concludes, in silence, with no one to correct the math, that if they mattered more, they would’ve been held tight, so they carry blame like a permanent, private path, convinced their worth burned out before they saw the light. Guilty for wanting more than crumbs left on the floor, guilty for a hunger that felt too big to hide, they learn to want less, and then to want no more, self-esteem erodes like a slow, retreating tide. Grown now, they wear a closet full of masks that never fit, grandiosity loud enough to drown the ache below, rage and loneliness trade places, bit by bit, and empathy, once starved, forgets how to show. This isn’t blood, no gene mutation to blame or trace, it’s a pattern handed down like a family heirloom curse, parent to child, an inherited, invisible embrace, the cycle spins on till someone dares to reverse. Gabor Maté says the body keeps what the mind can’t hold, trauma isn’t the blow — it’s the silence stored inside, a child will trade their own self to stay in the fold, and carry that quiet war for the rest of the ride. So here’s the truth, plain as bone, no science left to hide — the child of a narcissist inherits an empty throne, crowned as royalty in a kingdom that always denied, king of a castle built for one, and always alone.
…
DCG
Unhealthy narcissism is the result of emotional or physical neglect or trauma in early childhood. Kohut, a famous psychoanalyst, used to say, “Narcissism is a disease of deficiency.” The most common type of trauma is that of feeling neglected, ignored, disconnected, and misunderstood by those we love. If children become more of a burden than a pleasure, or if they project upon their children their own needs and ambitions, then children retreat into self-orientation as a defensive maneuver. When a child’s needs are unmet because of a parent’s self-focus or self-interest, they feel hurt, misunderstood, abandoned, and rejected. These feelings of loss require coping mechanisms that are not usually healthy, such as defensive independence, dissociation, and shame, due to their belief that their parents’ lack of interest in them and lack of acceptance of them is the result of their own lack of value. They may feel guilty that their needs for connection, which are unmet, are too intense and burdensome, which can lead them to have very low self-esteem. Long term, they may experience lack of empathy, loneliness, anxiety, depression, rage, grandiosity, shame, exhibitionism, and emotional immaturity. These pathological defenses are passed down generationally, not genetically. Unless the cycle is broken, children will likely parent as they were parented.
—
Erica Komisar’s paper Self-Focus or Sacrifice? What It Will Take to Rebuild the Mental Health of the Next Generation, published by ARC Research in February 2025.[squarespace] Komisar (a clinical social worker and psychoanalyst) writes: “Unhealthy narcissism, also known as secondary narcissism, … is the result of emotional or physical neglect in early childhood, which results in the withdrawal of interest from relationships as a defensive manoeuvre… Kohut called secondary narcissism a disease of deficiency; it is a maladaptive way of protecting the fragile ego. It is a defence designed to protect the individual against anxiety and other painful feelings connected with the disappointment in their mother; rather than invest emotion or depend upon an undependable mother or attachment figure, a person invests that emotion in themselves, or leans into defensive independence.” This lines up closely with the recording’s language on neglect, the Kohut “disease of deficiency” quote, defensive independence, and the generational, non-genetic transmission of these patterns.
The Name They Gave the Child Before the mirror learned to hold a face, a voice had taught the child to turn away. It called them difficult, slow, a waste of space, then handed them that verdict for the day. They grew around it like a tree round wire, mistaking pain for something they had grown. They learned to make their hunger sound like fire, then apologized for needing to be known. Guilt says, “I failed; I wish that I’d done right,” and leaves a door through which repair can start. Shame says, “You are the failure in the night,” then nails its little courtroom in the heart. It wears your voice because it knows the room, it quotes the ones whose love once made you bend. It says, “Be smaller, lest you bring your doom,” as if survival were a faithful friend. The body hears that old alarm bell ring, and thought becomes a courtroom in a flood. You cannot reason with a drowning thing, when every word arrives disguised as blood. So plant your feet; let breath outlast the fear, name five plain objects resting in the light. Cold water says, “The present moment’s here,” and gives the hunted nervous system night. Then tell one safe soul what the silence says, not every wound, not all you have survived. Just one small truth beneath the old malaise, and watch it live because you stayed alive. The world loves neat advice: “Just love yourself.” As if the heart were furniture to dust. It sells a slogan from a polished shelf, while wounded children starve beneath the rust. No, healing is not glitter, quotes, or wine, nor calling every wound a sacred gift. It is the slow return to what is mine, the hand that helps the buried self to lift. Ask, “How old am I when this feels true?” Then meet that age with eyes that do not flee. Say, “You were never what they called you, you—” say, “You were a child who needed safety.” Grieve all the doors you feared to enter through, the love withheld, the self kept out of view. But act before the old lie feels untrue: rest, speak, take space—let living evidence renew. You are not broken because you learned to hide, nor weak because the past still knows your name. Read this alone, and let this truth abide: the child was never shame—the child bore shame.
…
DCG
Internalized shame is a deep-rooted, detrimental belief that you are inherently flawed or unworthy, rather than simply feeling poorly about a specific action. Well, guilt says, “I did something bad.” Internalized shame says, “I am bad.” And it is often the painful byproduct of chronic childhood criticism, trauma, or emotional neglect. If you live with an inner critic that constantly tells you you’re too much, not enough, or always getting it wrong, you’re likely carrying internalized shame. That voice of criticism and judgment sounds like your own because you’ve heard it for so long, but it’s not you. It’s a part of you serving a function. More importantly, it didn’t begin with you. Internalized shame is learned. It often begins in childhood through repeated experiences with caregivers, teachers, peers, or culture that made you believe that your worth depended on a role you served or how well you performed it. Before you were old enough to question those messages or had an established sense of self, you absorbed that ideology as truth. Healing begins when you recognize that the shame you’re carrying was learned, which means it can be unlearned, and it’s not who you are.
So the first step here is: regulate your body before challenging the shame. When shame is activated, your nervous system shifts into survival, making clear thinking very difficult. So start with your body. Use grounding techniques. Press your feet into the floor, notice five things you can see or feel, splash cold water on your face or wrists, exhale longer than your inhale. Regulation of the nervous system creates the safety your brain needs to respond instead of react.
Step number two is: let someone safe witness your shame. Shame grows in secrecy but begins to dissolve in safe connection. Choose someone who has consistently shown up for you. Share one shame-based belief, not your entire story. Start slow. Then allow yourself to notice what happens when they stay present. This is corrective emotional experience in real time.
Step three is: find where the shame began. Internalized shame often lives in a younger part of us that accepted painful messages as truth. Ask yourself, “How old does this shame feel?” Picture yourself at that age. What did that child need to hear from a safe adult? Offer those words now. Healing happens when your adult self gives your younger self what was missing.
Step four is: grieve what shame cost you. Beneath shame is often grief for the opportunities you avoided, the relationships you never pursued, and the authentic parts of yourself that you learned to hide. Name those losses, journal about them, hold them, walk with them, cry if tears come. Grief creates space for what shame has been holding on to.
And finally, act before you fully believe you’re worthy. Healing doesn’t happen because you finally feel enough or you think it’s true. It happens because you repeatedly choose behaviors that contradict shame’s story. Speak up, set the boundary, rest without earning it, take up space. Every action becomes new evidence that rewires the beliefs shame taught you to carry. Healing shame isn’t about becoming someone new. It’s about returning to the version of you that existed before shame convinced you that you had to be anyone else but you.
We thought the needle told the tale but the empty room was shouting all along We watched a rat alone in steel two bottles waiting, one soft, one strong We said, “It chose the poisoned glass.” and missed the silence gnawing at its bone We named it weakness, called it sin and never saw it dying there alone Then came a cage with light and play tunnels, colors, food, and other eyes The same small body breathed again and turned away from chemical disguise In Rat Park, laughter filled the air the drug grew dull beside the living sound From near‑certain overdose in a void to almost none when friendship wrapped it round What if the hook is not the heart what if the cage is twisting what we crave? What if addiction is not pure rot but a bruised bond seeking something brave? We are built to cling, to reach, to hold to find a hand when night is low and black When no one answers, we still reach for anything that swears it has our back Some cling to dice and glowing screens some to bodies, some to powdered light We do not stop wanting when we hurt we only grasp what stands within our sight The opposite of addiction is not “clean” it is a voice that says, “You’re welcome here.” It is a table with one spare chair a listening face that will not disappear Yet we curse the bottle, not the bars we blame the wound and miss the hidden frame We point at “them” to dodge the truth that we build cages and then rename them “shame.” The cage can look like praise and wealth or quiet rooms where no one knows your name It can be trauma buried deep or slow forgetting of your living flame I, DC Gunnersen, stand and see a small experiment become a burning sign It speaks like prophecy to our age: change the cage, and watch the soul realign The message cuts through blame and fear: connection is the medicine we lack We are the builders of our parks and we can tear the isolating rack In simple terms, the warning’s clear: the way we live will shape the way we fall If we sow distance, numb and cold we’ll reap addictions answering our call But if we craft kind, human space where stories breathe and no one stands erased We may discover, one by one, the cages fade, and chains come loose, unlaced The power was never in the drug alone it lived in whether we were held or thrown aside So let us name our cages now and choose connection as our quiet guide
…
DCG
Screenshot
Almost everything we think we know about addiction is wrong. You get a rat and you put it in a cage and you give it two water bottles. One is just water and the other is water laced with either heroin or cocaine. If you do that, the rat will almost always prefer the drug water and almost always kill itself quite quickly. In the 70s, Professor Alexander comes along and he looks at this experiment and he notices something. He said, “Ah, we’re putting the rat in an empty cage. It’s got nothing to do except use these drugs. Let’s try something a bit different.” So, Professor Alexander built a cage that he called Rat Park. They’ve got loads of cheese, they’ve got loads of colored balls, they’ve got loads of tunnels. Crucially, they’ve got loads of friends. But here’s the fascinating thing. In Rat Park, they don’t like the drug water. You go from almost 100% overdose when they’re isolated to 0% overdose when they have happy and connected lives. What if addiction isn’t about your chemical hooks? What if addiction is about your cage? What if addiction is an adaptation to your environment? Maybe we shouldn’t even call it addiction. Maybe we should call it bonding. Human beings have a natural and innate need to bond. And when we’re happy and healthy, we’ll bond and connect with each other. But if you can’t do that because you’re traumatized or isolated or beaten down by life, you will bond with something that will give you some sense of relief. Now, that might be gambling, that might be pornography, that might be cocaine, that might be cannabis, but you will bond and connect with something because that’s our nature. The opposite of addiction is not sobriety. The opposite of addiction is connection.
Suffering is not born from the world’s brute storm, they say, but from the story you clutch when the light bends away. For ages this sounded like incense and prayer, like a line in a psalm that dissolves into air. Yet under bright scanners and hard metal rings, the old whispered claim has grown sinew and wings. Your brain runs a model, a phantom in flight, not the world as it is, but its best-guess of light. A controlled hallucination, the scholars declare, your cortex predicting what’s “really” out there. You don’t meet the world in its raw, naked skin, you meet your own map, folded tightly within. On that map is a figure, a name and a face, a continuous “you” threading time into place. This character feels solid, a column of stone, the one fixed observer in a world overthrown. But look a bit closer at this pillar of “me,” and hairline cracks spider through what you see. In deep meditation, when thoughts ebb and fall, the default-mode choir sings softer in the skull. The voice that repeats, “I am this, I did that,” begins to grow quiet, grows thinner and flat. Still the colors stay faithful to wall and to sky, still the sirens and birdsong go driving by. What shifts is the distance between “self” and the scene, the space that once bristled now falls in between. In certain bright states where the ego dissolves, the narrator’s grip briefly slackens, absolves. The story falls silent, the border grows thin, yet awareness remains, wide and lucid within. People don’t cry, “I lost something I need,” they whisper, “A wall I’d mistaken for me.” The Buddha once sat under branches and air, watching pain rise and fall like a prayer. He saw that our clinging to “I,” “mine,” and “own,” turns passing sharp stones into a permanent throne. Neuroscience arrives with its graphs and its scans, and finds similar patterns in synapses and glands. What the old ones intuited in silence and flame, the new ones can trace in a neuron’s small frame. Attachment to story is no moral disgrace, it is simply the brain keeping track of its place. Moment by moment, it stitches a thread, “this proves I’m unworthy,” “this shows I was led.” The hurt in your chest from a casual slight, is magnified more by the tale you recite. A setback at work, a door closing fast, becomes proof that you’re cursed by the weight of your past. Joy itself is recruited by this inner scribe, as a sign you’ve ascended to some special tribe. But joy doesn’t need such a noble veneer, it arrives, then it leaves, whether praised or in fear. When you notice the story instead of its claim, you see how it pours gasoline onto pain. You catch the first sentence that rises like smoke, “I always lose,” “I’m the cosmic joke.” You pause, and you label it “narration, not law,” and a small, simple gap opens up in your awe. The same old event still unfolds as before, but it no longer drags your whole self to the floor. Meditators, mystics, and skeptics all find, they’re quieting circuits, not trading a mind. Different their doctrines, their temples, their creeds, yet similar the hush when the story recedes. Practically speaking, this truth isn’t grand, it’s simple as breathing, as watching your hand. You can live as the character, clenched and afraid, or live as the witness to the story it’s made. Suffering still happens—this world has its teeth, but it need not be welded to your core beneath. Pain in the body is honest and clear, it rises, it peaks, it wanes and draws near. What turns it to torment, to lifelong despair, is the script that insists, “This defines what I bear.” Ancient philosophers touched this with words, monks felt it in stillness, in listening to birds. Modern machines see the network go dim, when the self-story loosens its ironbound rim. So what is observed when you truly attend? Not a fixed, final self, but a pattern that ends. The observer you think is unchanging and true, is largely the tale that your neurons renew. You are not only the character needing defense, you are also the field where it flickers and vents. When the story grows softer, the world doesn’t break, it simply appears with less personal stake. The point, crenellated in line after line, is quietly stark and disarmingly fine. The world was never shouting as loud as you knew, most of the thunder was coming from you. Let the verse sink in where your habits reside, and notice the places the narrative hides. Then, simply, gently, step back from the claim, and see that awareness is not bound to its name. In the end, what resolves all this into grace, is learning to suffer without a fixed face. To feel without clinging, to hurt without “mine,” is the oldest, and newest, contemplative sign. The self was the story about one who could see, and stories can quiet, and stories can free.
DCG
Screenshot
Suffering, the ancient philosophers insisted, does not arise from the world itself; it blooms in the space between events and the story you tell about them, in the fragile architecture of identity that you keep reinforcing day after day. For a long time, that sounded like the kind of thing only mystics and poets would say, more hymn than hypothesis. Yet as neuroscience has grown more precise, the old intuition has begun to look less like metaphor and more like a description of how the mind actually works.
Your brain is running a model right now, a living simulation stitched together from memory, belief, and a rolling narrative of who you think you are. Neuroscientist Anil Seth calls this a “controlled hallucination,” the brain’s best guess at reality, constantly revised as new sensations arrive and old expectations clash with them. You never meet the world directly; you encounter the model of the world, and inside that model resides a self—a continuous character with a past to defend and a future to secure. That character feels solid and non‑negotiable, like the central axis of your life that everything else must orbit. But neuroscience keeps finding small fractures in that apparent solidity, little places where the story of “me” slips and reveals itself as constructed.[Attachment] Judson Brewer’s work with experienced meditators, using fMRI to track what happens in deep meditation, offers one of those fault lines. In those states, activity in the brain’s default mode network—the circuitry most closely tied to self‑referential thought and inner narration—drops noticeably. This is the network that says, “I am this, I did that, I will become this,” the inner commentator stitching events into a biographical timeline. When it quiets, people do not report entering some alien dimension; they report a more subtle shift. The world remains the same—colors stable, sounds unchanged—but the sense of a separate self standing between awareness and experience loosens.
There is a second, more dramatic phenomenon: ego dissolution, described in research on psychedelics and certain forms of meditation and popularized by writers like Michael Pollan. Here the boundary between self and experience does not just soften; for a time, it seems to collapse. The narrator stops narrating altogether, and yet consciousness does not blink out; it remains, now without the constant commentary of “I, me, mine.” What is striking is how people describe this condition afterward. They do not say, “I lost something vital, and I want it back.” They say, “I realized something had been standing in the way,” as if the protective story had also been a veil.
From this perspective, the ancient philosopher was not urging you to abandon morality or deny the reality of pain. He was pointing at a mechanism that no one yet had the tools to observe: the way a brain, left to its own habitual loops, builds a narrative center and then interprets every event through its lens. Attachment to that story is not a sin; it is simply the default mode, the unexamined assumption that the character you play is identical with the awareness that watches. Moment after moment, the brain predicts and explains: this happened to me, this reflects on me, this threatens or affirms me. Over time, those interpretations congeal into a kind of psychological gravity well, pulling every experience into the same familiar orbit.
When meditation, psychedelics, or contemplative practice weaken the narrator, perception does not suddenly blossom into fantasy. Instead, it begins to arrive without being filtered through the character’s needs and fears. You still see the same room, hear the same traffic, feel the same weight of your body in the chair, but the story “I am the one to whom this is happening” loses some of its urgency. That is why contemplatives across traditions—Buddhist monks sitting in silent monasteries, Christian mystics praying in stone chapels, secular researchers watching their own breath on a lab cushion—often report experiences that sound uncannily alike. Their doctrines differ; their rituals and metaphors clash; but they are all experimenting on the same neural circuitry.
This raises a question that is as unsettling as it is clarifying: if this self can grow quiet without the world ending, if the “you” that seems to hold all the suffering is more like a narration layer than a fixed metaphysical fact, then what, exactly, has been suffering? Your body certainly knows pain, but it does not require a story to flinch from heat or shiver in cold. Your senses register the world’s impact—brightness, pressure, texture, taste—regardless of whether a narrator is composing paragraphs about them. Only the character suffers in the particular way that feels like “my suffering,” because only the character is invested in assigning meaning, in deciding that this event proves something about its worth, its desert, its fate.
When you look closely, you begin to see how much of your anguish depends on this layer of commentary. An argument with a loved one does not end with the last sharp word spoken; the argument migrates inward and becomes a story about being misunderstood, betrayed, or perpetually unseen. A professional setback is not just a lost opportunity; it becomes another chapter in the ongoing saga of failure or unfairness. Even joy gets appropriated by the narrator: instead of simply being happy, you start telling yourself that you are finally the sort of person who gets to be happy, or that happiness must be defended before it slips away. The event itself is brief; the narrative echo can last for years.
To hear that the self is a story the brain tells about the one who is seeing can sound cold at first, as if your most intimate sense of “I” were being reduced to mere fiction. But fiction is not nothing; it is one of the mind’s most powerful tools. Stories organize chaotic experience, connect past and present, and allow you to imagine futures that have not yet happened. The problem arises when you forget that you are not identical with the story, when the narrator claims to be the only voice in the room. Then every deviation from the script feels like a personal threat.
The contemplative traditions do not ask you to murder the narrator. They ask you to notice that it is not the only possible vantage point. In meditation, you sit long enough with breath or sensation that the habitual stream of commentary grows, if not silent, at least transparent—you can see through it. Thoughts arise and fall, including thoughts about “me,” but they are no longer taken as commands or prophecies. In those moments, awareness reveals itself as more spacious than the character who normally occupies center stage. The self, which once looked like a granite pillar, begins to feel more like weather: persistent, sometimes intense, but ultimately passing.
What would it mean to live with that understanding in ordinary life, far from retreat centers and laboratory scans? It might begin with a small act: noticing the story as it forms, instead of inhabiting it automatically. You feel a sting of shame and catch the sentence starting to take shape—“I always ruin things,” “People never stay,” “This proves I am broken.” Rather than arguing with the sentence or letting it dictate the rest of your day, you recognize it as narration: the brain reaching for continuity. That recognition does not erase pain, but it separates pain from the elaborate conclusions that prolong and intensify it.
Over time, this kind of noticing constitutes a quiet form of spiritual practice, whether or not you use religious language for it. It aligns with what monks have called detachment, what therapists call cognitive defusion, what some neuroscientists might simply label a change in self‑referential processing. The vocabulary shifts with the culture, but the direction of attention is the same: away from the defended character and toward the open field in which it appears. In that field, suffering still arises—it would be naive to pretend otherwise. But it no longer feels like a verdict on your identity.
The world, in the end, was never as loud as you thought. Circumstances come and go, fortunes rise and fall, relationships begin and end, and the raw data of experience continues to wash through your senses. What has been thunderous is the narrator, the incessant story of “me” trying to make sense of all that flux and, in the process, turning passing pains into permanent grievances. When that voice learns to soften—even slightly—the same world begins to feel less hostile. Events still hurt, but they hurt more simply. The self was not the one seeing; it was the story about the one seeing, and stories, unlike awareness itself, can go quiet.
Source 
Suffering, the ancient philosophers insisted, does not come from the world itself; it comes from your attachment to a story, to the tale you keep telling about who you are and what all of this means. For centuries, that kind of claim sounded like lyricism or mysticism, more poetry than proof. Now, under the lens of neuroscience, it reads less like metaphor and more like a description of a mechanism.[Attachment] Your brain is running a model right now—an actual predictive model built from memory, belief, and a continuous narrative of identity. Neuroscientist Anil Seth has called this a “controlled hallucination,” the brain’s best guess at reality, refined and updated in real time. What you experience as “the world” is not the world directly; it is this model, and the model includes you: a self, a character with a past, a trajectory, and a seemingly solid center. That character feels permanent, non‑negotiable, the one fixed point in the flux. Yet neuroscience keeps finding cracks in that apparent solidity.
Neuroscientist Judson Brewer, using fMRI scans on experienced meditators, found something unexpected during deep meditative states. Activity dropped in the brain’s default mode network, the circuitry most closely associated with self‑referential thought, the mental voice that says, “I am this, I did that, I will become this.” In these moments, that network does not vanish, but it grows quieter, less insistent, less central. When that narration fades, even briefly, people do not report the arrival of a new world; they report a change in their relationship to the same world. Colors do not shift, sounds do not distort, but the sense of a separate “me” standing between experience and awareness loosens.
Research into psychedelics and meditation, as reported by Michael Pollan, goes a step further and introduces what investigators call “ego dissolution.” In these states, the boundary between self and experience temporarily collapses, and the inner narrator does not just soften—it stops narrating altogether, if only for a moment. Paradoxically, people do not describe this as losing something essential; instead, they describe realizing that something had been standing in the way the entire time. The ancient philosopher, speaking from intuition and reflection, was pointing toward a mechanism that no one yet had a machine to see.
Attachment to the story of self, in this light, is not a moral failure or a character flaw. It is simply the brain running its default prediction loop, uninterrupted, moment after moment, across a lifetime. When the narrator weakens, perception does not become magical or otherworldly; it simply stops being filtered through the demands and anxieties of a character. This is why meditators from seemingly incompatible traditions—Buddhist monks, Christian contemplatives, secular researchers—often describe strikingly similar experiences. They are not converging on a single doctrine; they are all quieting the same neural circuit.
That convergence forces an uncomfortable question into view. If the self can fall quiet without the world ending, if the “you” that feels so bruised and burdened is, in fact, a layer of narration rather than a fixed ontological fact, then what exactly has been suffering all this time? It is not your body; the body does not require a story to register pain or pleasure. It is not your senses; they continue to function with or without a narrator commenting on them. Only the character suffers in this particular way, because only the character is invested in defending, explaining, and justifying itself.
The self, then, was never the thing that directly sees the world. It was a story the brain tells about the one who is seeing, a useful fiction stitched together from memory and prediction. And stories, unlike the raw fact of awareness, can go quiet. When they do, the world does not grow louder or stranger; it simply appears without being overshadowed by the constant commentary of “me.” The world was never as loud as you believed.
keep asking how I could be the one who will not stay inside When every cell in me is begging you, please don’t run, please don’t hide. I say I want a gentle love that meets me where I stand But I only start to feel alive when you slip out of my hand. I swear I’m hunting tenderness, a heart that shows me through Yet my body lights up like a storm when I am chasing after you. The steady ones feel colorless, like rooms without a sound I crave the door that slams on me, then creaks and swings back round. I learned this dance in childhood, where comfort came then froze Where warmth would turn to distance, like a door that never chose. Sometimes my needs were tended to, then suddenly withdrawn That rhythm carved my nervous system, dusk tied tight to dawn. Now intermittent kindness is the only song I know I wait for love, then brace for loss, then beg you not to go. In conflict I start shrinking first, I drop my fragile claim I fold my truth into an apology, take all the blame. I tell you, “You are right, not me, I should not feel this way” Because the thought of losing you still terrifies me more than what I say. I offer you my open throat and call it being kind While quietly I walk away from pieces of my mind. My boundaries blur to watercolor, soaking in your mood I call it love while swallowing my own unspoken food. I’ve been a lifelong strategist at not becoming left I trade my needs for borrowed peace, a quiet kind of theft. The spark I feel when I’m not enough is chemically precise It tastes like terror mixed with hope, the sweetest poison ice. My shadow loves this hunger, it mistakes it all for fate It thinks that burning in your orbit is the highest state. But every time I disappear to keep you from the door I’m teaching my abandoned self that she is less and less and more. More desperate and more silent, more hollow and more small Less worthy of a steady hand that doesn’t make her crawl. To heal, I must betray the script that kept me safe but tight I have to risk you walking out to stand inside my light. I have to name the pattern clear, the hook, the chase, the fear And treat my shaking honesty as something you must hear. Recovery is not romantic, it’s the slow unlearning of the chase It’s sitting with my lonely self, and letting stillness touch my face. It’s choosing those who show up close, not only when I bleed It’s reaching out with steady hands, not weapons of my need. My testimony isn’t clean; it’s ink and ash and bone But if you recognize this war, you don’t have to fight alone. We were not born to orbit hurt, or beg and call that care We’re meant to turn and face ourselves, and find someone still there.
RSP
…
DCG
Screenshot
Anxious preoccupied is actually very emotionally unavailable. According to Dr. Sarah Hensley-
Since I am an AP, I can testify to these statements when examining my behavior.
“I know the APs out there, you sweet, precious, warm, empathetic, loving APs, you’re like, how could I be emotionally unavailable? All I want from my avoidant partner is emotional vulnerability. No, you don’t. You think you do, but you are fundamentally not attracted to people who are emotionally available. In fact, they give you the ick. You’re not attracted to that. You are only attracted to people who give you the intermittent reinforcement, which is sometimes your emotional needs are met, then it pulls away, then sometimes they’re met, then it pulls away. That intermittent reinforcement is what you got in childhood. It is what creates your attachment anxiety and it is what keeps it flowing, okay? And you don’t know anything different than that. If they don’t give you a push–pull or if you don’t have to chase them and convince them that you are worthy of not abandoning, then you are not attracted to them. And then inside of conflict, sweet AP, you tend to fawn. You tend to give up on your own needs, abandon them, become boundaryless, become doormats, and hang on to whatever breadcrumbs you’re getting, okay? In conflict, you just go, you know, I’m sorry, you’re right. I’m sorry. Totally, you’re right. I shouldn’t have never brought that up. I shouldn’t have ever brought that up. You’re right, I’m wrong. Please don’t be mad at me because if conflict starts going sideways, that fear of abandonment pops up and it’s easier to just apologize and make it go away than actually stand strong in your own needs. It’s hard for you to speak up when things hurt you because, again, you are afraid of conflict because conflict could lead to abandonment. If you’re not being made to feel not good enough and working harder to be good enough in the relationship, you don’t feel that chemistry, you don’t feel that spark. And so, you’ve never really been attracted to people that could give you true emotional availability consistently inside relationships, and that has to do with your own deep fear of vulnerability yourself. But your superpower is your warmth and your kindness. Sometimes you can be a people pleaser—let’s face it, a lot of the time. You can be a people pleaser and whenever you’re people pleasing and you’re codependent and you’re boundaryless, you’re abandoning yourself. And I know that it’s hard to understand that what you’ve been doing most of your life is self‑abandonment, but it is. And earning your attachment security means that you get to finally stop abandoning yourself and finally give and receive true emotional vulnerability and emotional nurturing and co‑regulation inside of a relationship. You may be able to give some of it, but only to the person that makes you chase them to give it.”
You learned to disappear before you learned your name, standing in the doorway, counting how long silence could stay. Your toy was the clock and the way it slowed time, your prize was the numbness that kept you from crying. You built yourself a fortress out of distant skies, answering every question with carefully folded lies. Not because you loved deception more than truth, but because truth was punished in the halls of your youth. They called you “independent,” said you needed no one there, praising the way you vanished from the weight of honest care. You wore that word like armor over shaking skin, confusing being self‑reliant with never letting anyone in. John Bowlby would have seen the trail beneath your feet, the crumbs of broken trust that made closeness feel like defeat. He’d name the pattern “avoidant,” a dismissive kind of grace, where needing someone feels like a crime you must erase. You learned to love by stepping half a room away, heart in a locked drawer, smile on polite display. When someone moved closer, your body rang the alarm, not because they meant you danger, but because love once meant harm. CPTSD is not a headline carved in stone, it’s the quiet, constant weather in a house that’s never home. It’s the way you scan for exits when someone says your name, the way you blame yourself for every spark of shame. You dated like a ghost who paid the bill and left, leaving tender hearts behind you, puzzled by your theft. They only saw your absence, not the sirens in your mind, where every intimate moment felt like being trapped and tied. In your chest lives a child who still expects the blow, who flinches at the softness that they never got to know. Attachment was a storm that ruined every shore, so now you build your life inland and call it “needing less” and “needing more.” There are tragic little endings that no one ever sees, like the messages you never send and the hugs you never need. The partner who sleeps inches from your unconfessed despair, the friend you quietly abandon before they prove they care. Yet this is not an accusation, nor a pointing, shaming hand, just a mirror held with reverence so your heart can understand. That your distance is a language, not a moral, fatal flaw, learned from years of being punished simply for having needs at all. Healing does not demand you rush into the fire of touch, or trust the first kind stranger who swears they’ll be enough. It asks for tiny experiments where you stay when you’d withdraw, where you notice that your body shakes yet nothing breaks the law. One day you may discover, in a therapist’s calm room, or in the steady eyes of someone who does not presume, that survivorship was genius, not an error in your code, and that gently dropping armor is not betraying what you’ve owed. So if you see yourself here, in these quiet, careful lines, know this is not a verdict, but a space where truth aligns. You are not your distance, nor the silence you deploy, you are a nervous system that once had no other choice. CPTSD and attachment form a tapestry of scars, maps of how you protected your heart from loveless wars. And if you choose, with patient hands, to stitch a future new, you may find that what once saved you can learn to shelter you.
RSP
…
DCG
Screenshot
Survivors notes 
For many survivors, it feels like an incomplete story. Their trauma wasn’t a single, definable event; it was a prolonged state of being. This is the reality of complex PTSD, or CPTSD. Today, we cut straight to the point: we will explore the critical, life-altering differences between these two diagnoses. This isn’t just information; it’s validation for a pain that is often misunderstood, because you can’t begin to heal a wound you don’t fully understand. Let’s get into the differences.[Attachment] Difference one, the source of the wound. The first and most fundamental difference lies in the very nature of the traumatic experience; this is the bedrock upon which everything else is built. PTSD is typically linked to a single, terrifying event, or a series of events over a limited period—such as a serious accident, a physical or sexual assault, a natural disaster, or combat exposure. The event has a clear beginning and a clear end, even if the memory of it continues to haunt the present. The mind is trying to process an overwhelming experience that shattered its sense of safety in the world; it is a reaction to a horrifying event that happened to you. CPTSD, on the other hand, arises from slow, relentless exposure to trauma. It stems from prolonged, repeated traumatic situations where the victim has little or no chance of escape. This is not a single event; it is a state of being, often lasting for months, years, or even decades. The most common sources are experiences like ongoing childhood physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, being a prisoner of war, long-term domestic violence, or living in a situation with a complete loss of control. In these situations, the trauma isn’t an interruption to your life; it is your life. The person inflicting the pain is often a caregiver, a parent, a partner—the very people who were supposed to be the source of safety. This betrayal is a poison that seeps into the foundation of a person’s being. The wound of PTSD is a battle scar; the wound of CPTSD is the cage itself, and the memory of how you learned to live inside it. Difference two, the emotional echo. How the trauma echoes in a person’s daily emotional life is another key distinction. In PTSD, the emotional landscape is often characterized by extreme highs and lows. A person might experience intense flashbacks that feel as real as the original event, plunging them back into terror. They live in a state of hypervigilance, constantly scanning for danger with an easily triggered startle response; the emotional state is one of being on guard against a threat that might return at any moment. Then, to cope, they may swing to the other extreme—emotional numbness and avoidance—trying to feel nothing at all to escape the overwhelming fear. CPTSD includes all of that, but it goes deeper, affecting the very core of a person’s ability to regulate their emotions on a day-to-day basis. Because the trauma was constant, the dysregulation becomes constant. This can manifest as explosive anger that seems to come from nowhere, or a persistent, heavy sadness that colors every experience. It can also look like a chronic difficulty with self-soothing. While someone with PTSD might be trying to manage panic attacks, a person with CPTSD might be struggling with the basic act of feeling calm or content in their own skin. There can also be periods of suicidal thoughts, not necessarily from a desire to die, but from a desperate need for the relentless internal pain to finally stop. It’s not just about reliving the storm; for many with CPTSD, it’s about having forgotten what the sun ever felt like. Difference three, the shattered mirror. Perhaps the most painful and defining feature of CPTSD is its devastating impact on a person’s identity and self-concept. With PTSD, an individual’s sense of self is often shaken; they might say, “I’m not the same person I was before the accident.” The trauma is seen as something that happened to them, an external event that left an internal scar; they are a survivor of a terrible thing. With CPTSD, the trauma becomes internalized. It’s not what happened to you; it’s what you believe you are. Because the abuse or neglect was often relational and happened during formative years, the victim absorbs the blame. A child can’t comprehend that their parent is unsafe; instead, their mind concludes, “I must be unlovable. I must be bad. I am the problem.” This leads to a toxic sense of shame—a feeling of being fundamentally flawed, worthless, or disgusting, a belief that you are broken beyond repair. This isn’t just low self-esteem; it’s a core identity built on a foundation of worthlessness. While the person with PTSD fights the memory of what happened, the person with CPTSD fights the very reflection they see in the mirror every single day. Healing from PTSD is often about integrating a terrible memory; healing from CPTSD is about rebuilding a self that you were taught to hate. Difference four, the broken compass in relationships. Our early experiences form a blueprint for how we connect with others, and this is where CPTSD leaves one of its deepest and most confusing marks. For someone with PTSD, relationships can become difficult: they may withdraw from loved ones, feel detached, or become irritable, straining even the strongest bonds. Their fear and hypervigilance can make it hard to trust others and feel safe in intimacy; the world feels dangerous, so people feel dangerous. For someone with CPTSD, the blueprint for relationships itself is corrupted. The trauma was often inflicted by a person who was supposed to be a source of love and protection; the roles of caregiver and abuser, love and pain, became tangled together. As a result, relationships in adulthood become a minefield of confusion and fear. This can manifest in several ways: a person might desperately crave intimacy but be terrified of it, pushing away anyone who gets too close. They may unconsciously recreate the dynamics of their original trauma, finding themselves in relationships with people who are unavailable, controlling, or abusive, because chaos feels more familiar than safety. They may struggle to trust anyone, including themselves, leading to a painful sense of isolation—an invisible loneliness that persists even when surrounded by people. The core wound isn’t just a fear of being hurt by others; it’s a deep-seated uncertainty about what a safe and loving connection even looks or feels like. Difference five, the escape inside. Dissociation is a defense mechanism the mind uses to disconnect from overwhelming experiences; it’s a form of mental escape when physical escape isn’t possible. Both PTSD and CPTSD involve dissociation, but its role and presentation are different. In PTSD, dissociation often occurs during the traumatic event itself or during a flashback. It can feel like an out-of-body experience, or as if you’re watching a movie of your life; it’s a temporary, powerful defense against a specific, overwhelming threat. In CPTSD, dissociation is not just a defense mechanism, it’s a way of life. When a child is trapped in a reality that is consistently terrifying or painful, their mind learns to check out for long periods; it becomes a primary coping strategy that carries over into adulthood. This can look like chronic fogginess or brain fog. It can manifest as significant memory gaps from childhood. It can be a feeling of being a detached observer of your own life, as if you’re on autopilot. This isn’t just about escaping a memory; it’s about escaping the constant, moment-to-moment pain of your own existence. It’s the mind’s last refuge when the body cannot escape. This chronic detachment can make it incredibly difficult to feel present, to connect with your own emotions, or to feel truly alive and engaged in the world; it’s the ghost-like feeling of living a life that doesn’t entirely feel like your own. Difference six, the loss of a system of meanings. Finally, we arrive at one of the most existential differences: the impact on a person’s belief system. Trauma of any kind can shake a person’s worldview; someone with PTSD might struggle with the question, “Why did this happen to me?” and may feel that the world is a more dangerous place than they once thought. It challenges their sense of justice and safety. CPTSD, however, can completely annihilate a person’s entire system of meaning. When you have been systematically broken down by other human beings for a prolonged period, it can lead to a complete loss of faith in humanity itself. The belief in a just world, in the inherent goodness of people, or in any kind of higher power or spiritual source of comfort can be completely shattered. This isn’t just disillusionment; it’s a deep, spiritual despair—a sense of hopelessness that can feel absolute. The search for meaning becomes excruciating because the evidence of your life has shown you that meaning, safety, and justice do not exist. For many with CPTSD, the healing journey isn’t just about managing symptoms or processing memories; it’s the monumental task of trying to find a flicker of light, a reason to hope, in a world that they were taught is nothing but darkness. So, as we see, while they share the word trauma, PTSD and CPTSD are distinct experiences that leave different wounds. One is a scar from a terrible event; the other is a complex architecture of survival built in response to a toxic environment. Recognizing these differences is not an academic exercise; it is an act of validation. It is the first step toward finding the right kind of help, the right kind of therapy, and the right kind of self-compassion. Understanding that your struggles with relationships, your emotional turmoil, and your shattered sense of self are not character flaws, but predictable consequences of what you endured, is powerful. It shifts the narrative from “What is wrong with me?” to “What happened to me?” And that is where the power to heal truly lies.
Activity Becomes the Anesthetic (for the dismissive avoidant)
Busy is not a badge; it is a place to hide, You call it “getting things done,” but it is just another ride. Your calendar overflows; every hour has a name, You say you’re just “being productive,” but you are dodging the same shame. You answer every email; your phone is never still, You tell yourself it’s “just work,” but it keeps you from what you feel. You clean the house in circles; each task becomes a shield, You call it “keeping order,” but it is how your heart stays sealed. Motion feels like progress; your brain lights up and sings, You live inside the dopamine, avoiding deeper things. You are not just building a life; you are escaping quiet space, You say you like the action, yet you’re fleeing your own face. Silence is a mirror; you turn away and run, You call it “staying busy,” but it’s hiding from the sun. The real questions wait in stillness; they knock but you don’t stay, You tell yourself “not now,” and you push them all away. Activity is anesthetic; it numbs what aches inside, You call it “being strong,” but it’s just another hide. You fear the empty hour; it feels too wide, too real, You say you “hate wasting time,” yet it’s contact you won’t feel. Accountability is heavy; you shift it to the day, You call it “bad timing,” and you file the truth away. You keep your heart at arm’s length; the distance feels like air, You say you “just need space,” but it’s terror you won’t share. You downplay every longing; you label care as need, You call it “overreacting,” when love asks you to heed. You wear cool detachment softly; it looks calm, almost wise, You call it “being rational,” while emotion slowly dies. You turn from tender offers; you mask the sting with grace, You say “I’m just not ready,” and you leave an empty place. You skip the deeper talking; you say you don’t have time, You call it “keeping focused,” and avoid your inner crime. You minimize the rupture; you treat the hurt as small, You say “it’s not a big deal,” while their tears absorb it all. You act like love is simple; you keep it in your head, You call it “low drama” living, yet your heart stays underfed. You compare pain to others; you claim yours isn’t bad, You say “it could be worse,” and deny the hurt you’ve had. You do not lack all feeling; you feel the hidden burn, You call it “pressure,” “stress” or “noise,” but it’s the shame you will not turn. You learned that need is danger; you treat closeness as a threat, You say “I’m fine on my own,” though your body won’t forget. You carry old refusals; you pack them into stone, You call it “moving forward,” but you never grieve alone. You split care into tasks; you turn affection into plans, You say “I’ll help by doing,” and you keep from joining hands. You guard against dependence; you fear the asking gaze, You call it “healthy boundaries,” while you stand outside the maze. You know your patterns clearly; the evidence is plain, You say “this is just who I am,” yet that sentence holds your chain. You feel the quiet panic; it hums when someone stays, You call it “needing freedom,” and you step out of their ways. You turn love into a project; you treat trust like a test, You say “show me you’re different,” but you never bring your best. You move from talk to action; you jump from depth to chores, You call it “staying grounded,” as you lock emotional doors. You feel the weight of presence; you squirm when eyes are kind, You say “I’m just not used to this,” and retreat back to your mind. You are not broken, only guarded; your story made you numb, You call it “just my nature,” yet the truth still wants to come. The boldest move is stopping; to sit when nothing calls, You say you “don’t do stillness,” but that is where the mask falls. In that empty quiet hour, accountability appears, It does not come to punish; it comes to hold your fears. Shame is not a verdict; it is a wound in need of light, You call it “weakness,” “failure,” yet it softens when in sight. Activity is anesthetic; it keeps the ache at bay, But every small, brave pause you take lets healing find a way. You are more than your avoidance; more tender than you show, When you gently turn toward silence, your guarded heart can grow. This is not a condemnation; it is a map, not a wall, You are the one who suffers most when you will not hear the call
RSP
…
DCG
Screenshot
Busy is not a badge of honor. It is the most socially acceptable place to hide. Look closer at the constant motion, the endless tasks, the full calendar you complain about but secretly love. Most people are not busy building a life. They are busy escaping the silence where the real questions live. Here is the uncomfortable truth. Motion feels like progress, so your brain rewards it the same way. You answer emails to avoid the scary work. You clean the house to dodge the dream that might fail. Activity becomes an anesthetic. As long as you are running, you never have to ask if you are running in the right direction. And here is the twist. The boldest thing you can do is stop. Sit in the discomfort of an empty hour. That is where you finally hear what you have been drowning out. Productivity is sometimes just fear in a nicer outfit. Do less that distracts. Do more that matters. The two are rarely the same.
I write to you from inside the storm, and from the doorway where I watch it form. I have loved you mostly inside my head, a theater of scenes that never get said. You appear, then vanish, a flickering sign, and my heart runs after what is never quite mine. I call this love, but it burns like a fever, a vow to a ghost and a distant believer. I rewind small moments until they all blur, a glance, a breath, the way you never were. You stay perfected, framed in my mind, and I fade smaller just to keep you kind. I have abandoned myself chasing your name, walking over glass while calling it flame. Each silence from you becomes a loud judge, each crumb of regard, a banquet I won’t budge. Your armor is heavy, your doors stay closed tight, yet I camp at the gate, praying you’ll turn toward the light. You retreat into distance, I rush into fire, thinking if I burn enough, you’ll feel desire. I have studied our pattern like scripture and code, watched it etch scars in my nervous road. You step back whenever I try to draw near, and I step in closer every time you disappear. The gap between us is more than just space, it’s all of my effort poured into your grace. Now a new voice trembles under my skin, asking why I keep losing myself to not win. It tells me love is not meant as a chase, not an endless exam I must constantly ace. It whispers my worth is older than you, that my pulse didn’t start when you came into view. So I gather my pieces from altars and floors, and start closing shrines with your name on their doors. I turn these letters inward for the first time, writing truth to the self I left out in the grime. I step back, not to wound or accuse, but to finally stop making myself the one I lose. I still ache, I still want, I still remember your face, yet the fantasy no longer gets to set the pace. I walk away on unsteady, unfamiliar legs, carrying both my longing and unanswered begs. Somewhere beyond this unfinished, jagged bend, something real may rise—if I dare not write the end.
A poem for the people who have studied themselves and are still a little lost
I have been taking myself apart for years
and still I can’t explain the wreck
I know the diagrams, I’ve read the books
and still something’s caught in the neck
I’ve sat with therapists in quiet rooms
and walked out with the same old ache
the mirror offers nothing I don’t know
and still I can’t sleep when I wake
I know exactly how I pull away
I know the name of every wall
I built the taxonomy, laid it out flat
and then I went and did it all
There was a child who learned that love was leaving
who waited by a window every night
and when love finally stayed I found a reason
to stand up and turn off the light
The damage doesn’t stop when you discover it
it doesn’t care what you have named
it bleeds right through the bandage of your learning
and someone new gets stained
I’ve handed people maps of all my damage
said here’s the wound, here’s where it leads
and then I watched myself go right along
and plant the same old seeds
But something in the writing keeps me grounded
it pulls me back to what is real
not fixed, not freed, just willing to return
and say again what I still feel
There is a dignity in looking twice
in going back when nothing’s changed
the work is not the cure, the work is witness
a record of the strange
Fragility is not the proof of failure
the crack is where the light comes through
the fool who names his folly has more standing
than the one who never knew
I am not a villain for the wounds I carry
but I’m the one who gets to choose
I know the punchline now — it’s still worth laughing
at what I couldn’t bear to lose
About This Poem
I’ve been writing about myself for over fourteen years — the patterns, the contradictions, the gap between what I understand and what I actually do — and I still don’t have a tidy answer. That used to embarrass me. It doesn’t anymore, quite. What I’ve come to believe is that the examined life isn’t a problem to be solved; it’s a practice to be kept. This poem is about the specific frustration of knowing yourself well and still finding yourself at the same old crossroads — and why I think that frustration, named honestly, is worth more than a false arrival. If you’ve ever read something about attachment or self-sabotage and thought yes, that’s exactly it and then watched yourself do the thing anyway, you already know what this poem is about. My blog and Substack, going on fourteen years now, are built for the people who are still in that gap — not defeated by it, just honest about it.
Who This Is For
For the people who feel things deeply but can’t always find the words — and for whom someone else’s words, when they land right, feel like being heard for the first time. For the people sitting in the middle distance between belief and doubt, between knowing and doing, between who they were and who they’re trying to become. For anyone who has ever understood their own damage completely and still had to live through it anyway. That’s who I write for. That’s you.
If you never healed from what hurt you You’ll bleed on people that never cut you We carry storms in chambers of the chest And call it strength to never take a rest The mind builds monuments to silent pain While teaching lips to say we are okay again A child once learned that love could disappear So now the grown-up heart negotiates with fear We sharpen grief into a guarded tongue And wound the ones who never did us wrong The past is not a place that stays behind It leaks through cracks in memory and mind Each scar a thesis written in the skin Defending why we let no one come in But pain unattended does not fade away It reorganizes how we think and stay We measure kindness with a cautious eye Expecting every promise is a lie Yet still the soul remembers softer things A quiet hope that healing someday brings The truth is not that broken people fall It’s how they rise still carrying it all And sometimes drop the weight on those nearby Not out of malice—but they don’t know why We are not villains in the lives we shake Just humans shaped by every fracture we make But knowledge asks a duty to begin To face the dark we’ve buried deep within Because awareness is the first repair A choice to tend the wounds we used to wear Not every hurt deserves to be passed down Not every silence needs to be a crown We can unlearn the language born of pain And teach the heart to trust itself again To pause before the anger takes its turn And ask what deeper truth is left to burn Healing is not forgetting what was done But choosing not to harm another one So when we stand at edges of our past We learn which parts of us are built to last And in that moment—quiet, fierce, and true We stop the bleeding others never knew
You must be logged in to post a comment.