Childhood Emotional Wounds

Alexithymia 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment


Alexithymia


Alexithymia — a word she’s never heard —
is where she lives: no language for the heart.
Her feelings come like weather, without words,
and leave her with no map of where to start.
I grew up fluent in the language of need;
I learned to read a doorway for a sign.
I have ten thousand words for how I feel —
she has a silence where I lay down mine.
We met the way two old scars recognize
a shape they’ve known before a word is said:
her fear of holding on, my fear of goodbyes,
two childhoods braided into a single thread.
The closer that I came, the more she’d leave;
the more she’d leave, the harder I would chase.
Two nervous systems, armored to believe
that longing is a dangerous kind of grace.
She never left because I wasn’t enough —
I was more love than she had learned to hold.
The child whom no one comes for, in the dark, grows up
believing warmth is something to withhold.
And when the shame inside her starts to swell,
she nitpicks, distances, and turns away;
she calls my open heart “too much” — to hide
the words she was never given leave to say.
I’ve studied every pattern, every name —
Bowlby, the chase, the great and quiet retreat —
but knowing why a wound burns is not the same
as being healed; my pulse still skips the beat.
And love, I’ve learned, is real but not enough:
the healing has to be a mutual art.
I stay — but I will not abandon me.
I keep my worth, and I still keep my heart.
And still I count this strange and aching grace:
she woke me to my wounds and to my worth.
If we should ever heal, it’s face to face —
two warriors, laying weapons on the earth.
RSP

…

DCG

Alexithymia

A Post about the RSP/DCG epistolary collection, and the words she never had.

The Epistolary Collection
For nearly 3 years this blog has carried a single story told in installments — a collection of poems and reflections signed RSP … DCG: two initials, two people, one story. It began quietly with “A Leap of Faith” in 2017, a poem about the wounds parents leave when they cannot show love, and it has run through dozens of pieces since — “Heal with me RP”, “R and D”, “A heart’s whisper”, and “The dissolution of entropy”, among many others.
Read in order, the collection is an epistolary record of one relationship seen through the lens of attachment theory: my anxious attachment — the boy who learned to read a doorway for a sign, who sought approval because an absent father never offered it — and her dismissive avoidance, the woman who learned young that needing was dangerous and that the safest way to be loved was never to ask for it out loud.


This post is about the condition that sits underneath much of her avoidance, a condition that is tragic precisely because it is so often misunderstood: alexithymia.


What Alexithymia Is
The word comes from the Greek — a (no), lexis (words), thymos (emotions): literally, “no words for emotions.” It was introduced by the late Harvard psychiatrist Peter Sifneos in the early 1970s (Psychology Today).
A person living with alexithymia has difficulty experiencing, identifying, understanding, and expressing their own emotions. They may struggle to distinguish feelings from the bodily sensations that accompany them — a tight chest, a restless night — and their limited emotional vocabulary makes it hard to communicate what is happening inside them (Psychology Today; Luminet & Landré, PMC). It is not a mental illness or a character flaw. It is a trait, often forged in childhood, where feelings were not welcomed and no one came when the child cried.


The research links it directly to the attachment story this collection tells: the more avoidant the attachment style, the higher the alexithymia — avoidant individuals are particularly prone to difficulty describing feelings (De Panfilis et al., PMC; Zdankiewicz-Ścigała, PMC). The avoidance and the wordlessness are not separate problems. One grows from the other.
What It Is Like to Love Someone Without Words
I recently heard a widely shared video on Facebook — attributed to a speaker named Patrick, though I could not verify the source — about loving a dismissive-avoidant partner. Its central claim has stayed with me: your avoidant ex didn’t leave because you weren’t enough. They left because you were more than they could handle. Your emotional availability wasn’t the problem; it was the trigger. And underneath it all is shame — the quiet belief that they were not good enough for you.
That is the tragedy of alexithymia in a relationship. It is not coldness. It is not indifference. It is a person whose feelings still arrive — the ache, the longing, the shame — but who was never given the vocabulary to meet them. Imagine a life where your own heart speaks a language you were never taught, where every emotion arrives as weather without a forecast: unnamable, overwhelming, and therefore best avoided. Imagine being asked “how do you feel?” and having nothing to say — not because you feel nothing, but because you cannot find the door.
I am her opposite. I have ten thousand words for how I feel; I have written them here for years. She has a silence where I lay down mine. And that contrast — my fluency and her wordlessness — became the magnetic core of our dynamic: my anxious reaching, her avoidant retreating, the closer I came, the more she would leave. Two nervous systems, each armored by childhood, each mistaking the other’s survival strategy for rejection.
What I Have Learned
The hardest and kindest truth this collection has taught me:
Love is not enough. Not by itself. Healing requires mutual work. One person cannot do the interior labor of another, no matter how patient, how fluent, how willing. I know this now — I wrote it into “Cliff notes from the heart”: love that saves another must not teach me how to lose.

I must not self-abandon. Staying in the push-pull is only survivable — only humane to us both — if I keep my worth, my boundaries, my self. Understanding her condition does not require dissolving into it. Empathy without self-erasure is the discipline.
Knowledge helps, but it does not heal. I have studied Bowlby, the patterns, the chase-and-retreat. My pulse still skips. Knowing why a wound burns is not the same as being healed — hers or mine.


And still — gratitude. She woke me to my own attachment wounds. Because of her, I found the boy in the doorway, and I have spent years learning to take his hand. Whatever else this relationship becomes or fails to become, that awakening is a gift I will not stop counting.

The poem below distills all of it — her alexithymia, my anxious heart, the shame she carries, the work only she can do, and the strange, stubborn, profound love that remains.


Alexithymia — a word she’s never heard —
is where she lives: no language for the heart.
Her feelings come like weather, without words,
and leave her with no map of where to start.
I grew up fluent in the language of need;
I learned to read a doorway for a sign.
I have ten thousand words for how I feel —
she has a silence where I lay down mine.
We met the way two old scars recognize
a shape they’ve known before a word is said:
her fear of holding on, my fear of goodbyes,
two childhoods braided into a single thread.
The closer that I came, the more she’d leave;
the more she’d leave, the harder I would chase.
Two nervous systems, armored to believe
that longing is a dangerous kind of grace.
She never left because I wasn’t enough —
I was more love than she had learned to hold.
The child whom no one comes for, in the dark, grows up
believing warmth is something to withhold.
And when the shame inside her starts to swell,
she nitpicks, distances, and turns away;
she calls my open heart “too much” — to hide
the words she was never given leave to say.
I’ve studied every pattern, every name —
Bowlby, the chase, the great and quiet retreat —
but knowing why a wound burns is not the same
as being healed; my pulse still skips the beat.
And love, I’ve learned, is real but not enough:
the healing has to be a mutual art.
I stay — but I will not abandon me.
I keep my worth, and I still keep my heart.
And still I count this strange and aching grace:
she woke me to my wounds and to my worth.
If we should ever heal, it’s face to face —
two warriors, laying weapons on the earth.

RSP

…

DCG

Sources
• Alexithymia — Psychology Today
• Alexithymia — Luminet & Landré, PMC (NIH)
• Adult attachment and emotional awareness impairment — PMC (NIH)
• Attachment Style, Early Childhood Trauma, Alexithymia — PMC (NIH)
• Understanding alexithymia: a review — Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology Sciences
• Thunder God Blog RSP/DCG collection: A Leap of Faith · Heal with me RP · R and D · A heart’s whisper · The dissolution of entropy · Cliff notes from the heart · Full RSP/DCG index
•

Alexithymia

Let me reassure you: your avoidant ex didn’t leave because you weren’t enough. They left because you were more than they could handle.
You were emotionally available. You were intentional, vulnerable, expressive, loving, compassionate, and invested. You offered real intimacy, the kind they never learned how to hold.


And here’s the part that hurts. They saw how special you were. They knew exactly what they had, and that is why they ran. Your emotional availability wasn’t the problem. It was the trigger.


People with dismissive avoidant wounds grew up without emotional safety. Feelings were not welcomed. Affection wasn’t consistent. Their needs were minimized, or even ignored. So they grew up believing: “My feelings are wrong. Love is unsafe. If someone sees the real me, they’re going to leave.”


Their childhood taught them to protect themselves by shutting down, by avoiding closeness, by suppressing their emotions to the point that they can’t even feel their own. So when someone like you shows up, open-hearted, expressive, and emotionally mature, it exposes every single wound they’ve spent their entire life hiding.
They don’t have the capacity for deep connection yet. That’s not because they don’t want it. It’s because they were never taught how to do it. They can only handle surface-level connections, casual intimacy, and relationships that require very little emotional depth.
That’s why many avoidants end up with emotionally unavailable partners: narcissists, other avoidants, people who keep everything on the surface. It feels safe. It’s not fulfilling, but it’s safe.
But when they meet someone like you, someone who loves with depth, who sees them clearly and cares anyway, it overwhelms them. Deep down, they don’t even feel worthy of that kind of love.


So instead of dealing with that shame, they blame you. They nitpick. They distance themselves. They make excuses. It’s not because you did anything wrong. It’s because facing their wounds is too painful. They tell themselves you’re “too emotional” or “too much,” when really, you were everything they wished they could be.


Until they’re ready to self-reflect, sit with their own insecurities, face their shame, and heal, they’re going to keep running from the very thing they long for.
Your love didn’t scare them. Their unhealed wounds did.
And please tattoo this on your heart: it was never because you weren’t good enough. It was because, deep down, they believed they weren’t good enough for you.

— Patrick Gaudet

I learned which self to wear 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

learned the weather in a face
Before I learned to write;
A spoon set down a shade too hard
Could change the shape of night.
“Do I fit here?” I ask the page.
“Is this what made me so?”
My stomach answers every knock
Before I say hello.
“You’re good with people.” Yes, perhaps.
I learned which self to wear;
Could make a joke, could swallow grief,
Could almost turn to air.
I hear the break beneath “I’m fine,”
Then lie awake till two;
My inner smoke alarm makes toast
A matter to review.
But does a silence mean contempt?
Must every pause mean rain?
I know how fear can forge a key
That fits the wrong old pain.
And still, a song can split my chest;
Small kindness makes me weep.
I watch someone pull up a chair
For one left out—and keep.
“Was childhood, then, a gift?” I ask.
“No. Children should feel safe.”
Whatever good my heart grew toward
Does not excuse the strafe.
“Must I repair each hurt I sense?”
“No. Ask before you mend.
You need not climb inside each wound
To be a steady friend.”
I cannot know each heart I feel;
I can ask, listen, stay.
The gift is not that hurt was good—
But love can choose its way.

…

DCG

You are allowed to feel things deeply, and I do not mean that as reassurance. I mean it as neuroscience.
Because the depth with which you feel things is not a flaw in your emotional regulation, and it is not a sign that you are too sensitive or too much. It is a measurable neurological capacity, and it comes with abilities that people who feel less deeply simply do not have access to.


Here is what is actually happening in a brain that feels deeply.
Research from psychologist Dr. Elaine Aaron identified a trait present in around 20% of the population called sensory processing sensitivity. In brains with this trait, several regions show measurably greater activation in response to emotional and sensory input: the insula, which governs interoceptive and emotional awareness; the mirror neuron system, which governs empathy; and the regions associated with depth of cognitive processing.


A brain that feels deeply is not malfunctioning. It is running a richer, more detailed, more thorough processing of experience than a less sensitive brain runs.
You do not feel too much. You feel accurately at a resolution most people cannot access.
Here is what that capacity gives you.
You notice the shift in someone’s mood before they have said a word. You feel the emotional undertone of a room. You are moved by beauty in a way that people who feel less deeply genuinely cannot understand. You form connections with people that reach depths shallower processors never touch. You experience music, art, nature, and love with an intensity that is the entire point of being alive.
And yes, the same capacity that lets you feel joy that deeply also lets you feel pain that deeply. You cannot have one without the other. They run on the same neural system.


But here is what you were never told.
The depth is not the problem. The problem was being raised in an environment that treated your depth as an inconvenience rather than recognizing it as a gift. You were asked to turn down something that was never meant to be turned down.
You are allowed to feel things deeply, not despite the pain it sometimes brings, because the depth is who you are.

And the world needs the people who feel it all far more than it needs the people who have learned to feel nothing.

— neuroscience with Nora 

They hide the fears that need a hand 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

Some children watch the doorway,
And learn to read the night;
They hide the tears that need a hand,
To keep the grown world right.
They hear, “You are so strong now,”
And learn what praise can cost;
The child who keeps the house from breaking
Is still a child being lost.
Years pass, but shoulders tighten
When footsteps cross the floor;
The danger may have left the house,
Yet breath still guards the door.
Why does a quiet evening
Feel like a coming storm?
Why does a heart reach out for love,
Then shrink from something warm?
They work until their hands are shaking,
And call exhaustion care;
But if their worth depends on giving,
Who sees the person there?
The mind can name the old hurt,
Yet tears still need their say;
To know why sorrow filled a room
Does not yet clear the way.
So grief sits down beside them,
And speaks what none could hear:
“You should not have held that burden;
Your needs belonged here.”
They need not build a life on blame,
Nor claim the hurt was right;
They turn toward what they can change,
And bring their choices into light.
They pause before the old surrender,
Let “no” stand without shame;
Accept a hand, rest without earning,
And practice when fear comes again.
They meet the self beneath the duty,
And give its hopes a voice;
The past may knock, but need not lead—
With care, they learn to live by choice.

…

DCG


It begins quietly, almost unnoticed. You’re only six years old, huddled by the door frame, watching your parents fall apart piece by piece. Maybe it’s addiction, maybe it’s explosive rage. Maybe it’s just the cold void of an adult who can no longer show up.


In that moment, something primal clicks in your young mind: “If I don’t hold everything together, there’ll be nothing left.”
This is how a child disappears—not literally, but spiritually. They learn to smile more, cry less. They learn to read the room before speaking. They become the family’s emotional thermostat. They turn into miniature adults while their minds are still far too tender, and the world pats them on the back with praise: “You’re so mature, you’re so reliable, you’re so resilient.”


But no one stops to ask: What’s the cost?
This is the invisible pain of children who grow up too fast. Today, we’ll dive deep into the psychology of that child, because the consequences don’t fade with time. They shape you, follow you into relationships, careers, and the way you see your own worth.
If you don’t understand what happened, you’ll spend your entire adult life repeating survival patterns that once saved you but are now quietly eroding you.


Let’s start with what really happens in development. When children are forced to prop up adults’ emotions instead of being propped up, psychologists call it role reversal. That’s when the child becomes the caregiver, the mediator, the counselor, the protector.
This isn’t just unhealthy; it rewires the brain. Because when a child is constantly responsible for regulating emotions—their own or others’—it creates a state called hypervigilance. You’re always scanning for danger, you walk on eggshells, you learn that love is a transaction. You bring peace; maybe they’ll give safety.
You learn that your needs are a threat, while theirs are urgent. So you erase yourself—not physically, but emotionally. Instead, a version of you grows, one that performs perfectly. You become the good kid, the quiet achiever, the therapist friend, the one who never asks for anything.
And you wear that mask so convincingly that even you forget it’s fake. But deep down, something aches, something bleeds for the child inside that you buried but didn’t kill. It’s still there, screaming in silence: “Why didn’t anyone protect me?”
As you grow up, the symptoms get more complex. You might become hyper-independent. You reject help, push people away, or never feel truly safe in love. You might freeze in moments of joy because happiness feels foreign, undeserved, even dangerous. You might be unable to rest because productivity is the only way you’ve ever felt valuable.
And worst of all, you might not realize you’re still stuck in survival mode. Because when dysfunction is normalized early, your nervous system accepts chaos as baseline. Silence feels wrong, peace feels suspicious, love feels like a debt you have to pay.
This is the psychology of a child forced to grow up too fast. It’s not just sadness; it’s complex trauma that reshapes how you see the world, and more importantly, how you see yourself.


Now you might wonder: Why would a child willingly take on that role?
Because children will do anything to maintain attachment, even abandon themselves. That choice is never conscious. It’s biological instinct. In the absence of safety, the child sacrifices authenticity for belonging. That’s not weakness, that’s intelligence, that’s instinct.
But the tragedy is this: What once saved you now imprisons you.
So many of us walk around as high-functioning adults with deeply abandoned inner children pulling the strings. We achieve greatness to earn love, we stay silent to avoid abandonment. We care for everyone but secretly hope someone asks if we’re okay.
And that fantasy—that someone will see you’re not as strong as you pretend, that maybe, just maybe, you’ll be allowed to fall apart and be held—that’s the unmet need, not of the adult ego, but of the child who never got to be a child.


The first step to healing isn’t fixing; it’s witnessing. Because until you acknowledge what happened, you’ll keep lying to yourself with thoughts like: “It wasn’t that bad. Others had it worse. I’m fine.”
But fine is just another mask, and deep down, you know it.
So what happens to that child when they grow up? They become adults who never feel safe, even in quiet rooms. They become lovers who can’t trust tenderness. They become givers who can’t receive. They become the type who apologizes for crying, flinches at compliments, and mistakes burnout for success.


This is the price of growing up too early. Because if childhood trained you to be strong at the cost of softness, silent instead of honest, fixing others while ignoring your own cracks, what kind of adulthood do you inherit?
You inherit a life where you’re always holding your breath, waiting for someone to finally let you break.
But here’s the truth: No one is coming to save the child you buried. You have to go back and take its hand. You have to say what no one ever said: “You didn’t deserve that. You were just a kid. You get to rest now.”


This is the beginning of shadow work—not fixing, not performing, not dodging pain with fake positivity, but returning to the abandoned parts of yourself and saying: “I see you now, I hear you, and I’m not leaving.”
That’s the rebuilding process, and it’s brutal because it requires you …

— attribution unknown

But I recognize the patterns

It is now that I begin to truly see 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The dream: 2247 Baily Avenue.

The childhood home — one room where I grew up, and then the other room, once my brother’s, where I stayed with my own children for a time after my divorce.


Two kinds of shame: one as a child, and one as an adult.
The shame of the adult takes an even tighter hold on the constraints of your manhood when it is shared with your own children. That differs from the shame you carry as a child yourself, growing up in the house of pain.

How you deal with the shame you feel depends a great deal on the audience around you.

Note

The trauma: CEN or childhood emotional neglect: CPTSD 

The father: authoritarian narcissistic

The mother: codependent, and lived in fear, but also looked away and did not protect

The ex-wife: also authoritarian with a need for control

In one room, you are the child

And in another room, you have your children who see 

Two rooms in the same bewilderment

The common denominator: me

The activities of a child versus 

The activities of a man

The comparison is poignant

But the shame still stands

I now understand my trauma

Unhealed wounds must be processed through connection

In silence, they fester unseen

So with this testimony, I raise my objection 

One shame is learned

One is self created

The burdens of inequity

When you point the finger at yourself – it’s related

The lessons of accountability

And the politics of shame

It’s extremely hard to point the finger

When the finger is pointed at your name

Oh how we justify

The economy of quid pro quo

Just what do we testify?

Sometimes, I don’t rightly know

Like sitting in your own church

Like sitting in your own pew

Just what will we receive?

Just what will we do? 

In childhood I learned to overthink

In adulthood, I did the same

I now try to integrate emotion 

The man, the boy, and the claim 

Over 50 years with living in silence

The reflection from the polished mirror, I am now me 

Funny how when I start to go blind

It is now that I begin to truly see 

CLG

…

DCG

I convalesce 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

In the sanitarium of my mind

I convalesce

Just what then will I epitomize?

Or, do I digress?

The mind is a curious domain

You can turn your attention inside

Discover the connections you’ve made

Then learn where the pit of your fears reside

Consider the invisible opérations

Disassociation or self defense

The subconscious training rituals

The impulse to build a fence

Observations from the playground

Internalized with limited objectivity

Often laid dormant or forgotten

In the shadows of obscurity

Is it really too much to ask?

How we descend upon humanity? 

How we treat each other and ourselves? 

The question in perpetuity 

Some say only knowing the reasons

Will not be enough

You must also be able to feel

Or your experience is just a bluff

The body holds its own accounting
A ledger written in the chest,
A tightness where the words fall silent,
A weight that will not let me rest


What wounds the most is often absent,
Not the blow, but what was never there,
The comfort missing from the doorway,
The empty space of unmet care


A child will trade away the feeling
To keep the bond that keeps him fed,
Authenticity for attachment,
A quiet bargain in his head.


So I learned to think instead of feeling,
To analyze and not to weep,
Assembled reason like a fortress,
And buried sorrow in the keep.


But thought without the heart is exile,
And feeling without thought, a flood;
The mind must learn to hear the body,
The pulse, the breath, the rush of blood.


So I return to meet the younger,
The one who stood beside the wall,
And name the ache he could not utter,
And answer, finally, his call.


To face the shadow is not surrender,
But gathering what was cast aside;
The anger I was taught to swallow
Becomes the strength I need not hide.


Responsibility becomes the medicine,
To carry what I did not choose,
To bear the load and find the meaning
Within the things I feared to lose.


Compassion, then, is not indulgence,
But curiosity made kind,
A question asked without a verdict,
A gentle light within the mind.


The fence I built becomes a garden,
With gates I open and I close;
Not every soul will find the entrance,
But those who do, the heart well knows.


So in the sanitarium of my mind,
I convalesce, but not alone;
The thinking and the feeling marry,
And I, at last, am coming home.

…

DCG

If every lock opened with every key, keys would become useless. People work the same way. You aren’t meant to connect with everyone. The people worth keeping are the ones your personality was meant to unlock. Because your job isn’t to open every door, it’s to find the ones you were made for.

— unknown 

Am I  Channeling  Carl Jung

~ DC ~ Leave a comment


Am I Channeling Carl Jung?


Why do I keep returning to the door
I learned to fear before I learned my name?
What am I hoping to find beneath the floor?
Why does each poem go back there just the same?
Jung called it shadow: what we push away.
Is mine the anger I was taught to hide?
If I invite it in, what will it say?
And can I hear it without taking its side?
I wrote of learning silence in a house.
Did silence keep me safe, or leave me small?
Do I still go quiet as a mouse
When no one here is angry after all?
I wrote of wearing calmness like a coat.
Who taught me how to fasten every seam?
When hurt comes near, why do I clear my throat
And speak as though I’m safely in a dream?
Why does my pride arrive prepared for court
With every slight arranged to make its case?
What does it guard when it cuts kindness short?
What fear is hiding underneath its face?
I wrote that thought could make a fortress last.
Was learning then a shelter from the pain?
When I explain each detail of the past,
Why does my heart still walk into the rain?
I studied how a person comes to be,
The mind, the soul, the habits we repeat.
Did all those years of study help me see,
Or keep me from the feeling at my feet?
Jung listened for the parts a life concealed.
Do I keep hearing them beneath my page?
Is there a grief I’ve carefully not revealed,
Or fear I’ve called good sense for half an age?
Why do I read a silence as a sign?
Why do I search a face for coming rain?
Whose old voice sounds so much like mine
When I tell myself I must endure the pain?
What do I make of that boy on the field,
Still waiting for somebody to draw near?
What did he learn when no one asked him how he’d healed?
Why does his silence still live in me here?
I speak of love, then turn and guard the gate.
I ask for closeness, then prepare to flee.
Is this the shadow Jung asked us to face:
The frightened part I will not let be me?
And what of all the good I set aside?
The softer self I feared the world would bruise?
Is there a gentleness I learned to hide
Because I thought that I would have to choose?
Would Dostoevsky’s man beneath the ground
Know why I argue with myself at night?
Do I build proofs where no proof can be found
So I can say I’m right instead of frightened?
Why does this question follow all I write?
Has something pressed its shape into my soul?
If I can name the thing and bring it light,
Must I still feel it to become more whole?
I think of Maslow and the life I sought.
Is growing more than reaching some clear height?
If all I’ve done is learn to master thought,
Who holds the hurt I keep outside my sight?
Am I, like Jung, pursuing what I miss
When I mistake the mask for all I am?
Can I hold both the wound and joy in this,
And stop condemning one to save the man?
I almost sign this page, then change my mind.
Must I give strangers every private name?
Can I leave those I love and hurt behind
The curtain, yet speak plainly of my shame?
Can I ask the question without scorn?
Can I meet the boy and not demand his proof?
What part of me was waiting to be born
While I stood outside myself beneath the roof?
Please help me understand what’s going on inside.
Not just the story, but the ache beneath.
Can I sit with what I used to hide
And let a feeling pass without a speech?
I think I’m on a path that Jung once knew:
To meet the hidden self, not win a fight.
My steps are mine; his questions help me through.
Could I be growing whole by facing night?

…

DCG

“The most self-aware person in the room is often hiding the deepest pain.
People who were emotionally neglected as children become the biggest intellectualizers in therapy and the healing journey. They get stuck overanalyzing over and over, but terrified of feeling anything in their body.
They might walk into a therapist’s office and get told, ‘Wow, you’re so self-aware. Seems like you got it all figured out.’ But instead of relief and validation, they feel hollow instead, because what’s actually happening is a defense. It’s the suppression of the grief, the anger, the shame, the anxiety that never got to cycle through to actually release.
You see, a child’s first instinct when they are neglected is to cry out for help, to reach for connection. But when that call keeps getting ignored, they learn something else instead: that their cries don’t work. And so they go into the prison of their mind instead. They suppress the feeling, they disconnect, dissociate, and intellect becomes the only safe place left.
And it sure fools everyone, including themselves. But what’s underneath is a nervous system that actually collapsed. It’s the belief that feeling emotions puts them in a helpless and hopeless situation.
The intellectualization isn’t really making them smarter. It’s just trauma that’s still in control, and it costs them dearly: relationships that never really feel safe, a body that never gets to relax and loosen up, years—maybe even decades—understanding themselves so perfectly while nothing actually changes underneath.
But eventually, like all coping mechanisms, it starts to break at the seams: random bouts of crying, reactivity that they can’t explain, numbing out, avoiding hard conversations, or having hard conversations that immediately turn into explosions.
Now, if this is you and you want to get out of this, you have to go beyond the mind, and that’s a journey into the body, into the nervous system, into the parts that you never got to develop.
So one quick move that you can do the next time that feelings come up inside you is to place a hand—a soft hand—on where you notice it in your body. And there’s a lot of science backing this up now: just stay with it for at least 60 seconds and ride it out. Let the feeling happen. Short window, but big impact.
You might find out that you actually move through the feeling and get to the other side without having to suppress and overthink.
— mindfulness 

The boy in the doorway

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

An announcer voice opens the show as “The Thunder God Radio Hour,” introduces the title and author, and calls out each chapter break the way a 1940s serial would.

The dream after the wound 

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The Dream After the Wound


A hypothesis on waking reflection, trauma patterns, and the possibility of becoming


Prologue: The Work of Looking Again
This is not an argument that dreams are prophecy, coded instruction, or a perfectly accurate archive of childhood. It is a more modest—and perhaps more useful—hypothesis: when we examine dreams in waking life, we may find a temporary clearing in which old emotional patterns become visible.
For a person shaped by developmental trauma, the past does not always remain in the past. It can persist as an automatic orientation toward danger, abandonment, shame, appeasement, isolation, or self-erasure. These patterns may have begun as intelligent adaptations: a child’s effort to preserve safety, attachment, or emotional survival when there was not enough protection, explanation, or comfort available. The problem is not that the child adapted. The problem is that the adaptation can continue long after the original danger has passed.
Gabor Maté’s formulation is useful here: trauma is not only the event; it is also the wound that forms within a person as a result of what happened. In childhood, this inner wound may deepen when difficult experiences must be endured without a dependable adult to help name what occurred, regulate overwhelming feeling, or restore a sense of safety.[cbc]
Dreams may not give us a literal replay of the past, yet they can present its emotional architecture. A dream may place us in an unfamiliar house, a lost city, a crowd, a classroom, a family gathering, an impossible journey, or a relationship that never existed exactly as shown. But beneath the altered scenery, a recognizable pattern can emerge: I am alone again. I cannot speak. I must rescue someone. I will be punished for being seen. I cannot get home. I must work harder to be loved.
The hypothesis explored here is that writing down and reflecting upon such dreams can make these patterns more available to conscious thought. The dream becomes less a verdict and more a scene for inquiry. Rather than asking, “What does this dream prove?” we might ask, “What old emotional rule is appearing here, and does it still have to govern my life?”
This approach is not a replacement for trauma-informed therapy, medical care, or sleep treatment. It is a personal testimony and a perspective open to examination. For me, DC Gunnersen, the practice has offered a way to meet old material at a distance—not to deny it, not to dramatize it, but to look again, with more adult capacity, more language, and more choice than I had when the original experiences occurred.
A Waking Study of Dreams
I have lived with the reverberations of childhood trauma and what is often called complex post-traumatic stress. I have known how the past can become a hidden operating system: working underneath ordinary life, shaping expectations, reactions, attachments, fears, and the instinct to abandon oneself before anyone else has the chance.
For years, some of these patterns were not fully visible to me in daylight. They arrived as reactions before they arrived as thoughts. A moment of silence from another person could feel like rejection. A disagreement could feel like danger. A need could feel like a burden. A private shame could masquerade as a moral obligation to remain quiet, useful, agreeable, and unseen.
Then dreams began to offer another kind of encounter.
I have used methylene blue for several years and have noticed unusually vivid dreams, often remembered in striking detail upon waking. I do not offer this as evidence that methylene blue is a treatment for trauma, or as a recommendation for anyone to use it. It is not. In particular, methylene blue can interact dangerously with serotonergic medications and substances, and should be reviewed with a prescribing clinician or pharmacist who knows a person’s complete medication and supplement list.[fda +1]
But the vividness itself led me toward a practice: I began to record dreams, sit with their emotional atmosphere, and ask what old pattern might be moving through a new story.
The important insight was not that every image possessed a fixed symbolic definition. A locked door is not always “about” one thing. A childhood home is not necessarily a recovered factual memory. A threatening stranger may not stand for one identifiable person. Dreams can be strange, composite, theatrical, and irrational.
Yet their emotional movement can still be instructive.
A person may dream of being late, but the deeper experience is terror at disappointing someone. One may dream of losing a way home, while the living theme is disorientation after years of emotional neglect. One may dream of trying to speak but having no voice, and recognize an old learned rule: My truth creates trouble. My needs cannot be safely heard.
The waking examination of a dream can therefore become an exercise in compassionate pattern recognition. It may allow a person to notice the difference between an old survival expectation and a present reality.
That difference matters.
What Evidence Supports
There is evidence for the broader claim that sleep, especially REM sleep, is involved in emotional-memory processing. Researchers have linked REM sleep with the processing of emotional and fear-related memories, while PTSD is associated with disturbing dreams, recurrent nightmares, and disrupted sleep processes. This does not prove that every dream reveals a hidden personal truth. It does suggest that dreams can be connected to the emotional material the brain and nervous system are working with.[nih +1]
There is also evidence that deliberately engaging dream imagery while awake can help some people with trauma-related nightmares.
The clearest example is Imagery Rehearsal Therapy—also called nightmare rescripting. In this structured cognitive-behavioral approach, a person identifies a recurring distressing dream, changes the storyline into a less threatening or more empowered version, and rehearses the revised imagery during waking hours. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine identifies imagery rehearsal therapy as the recommended treatment for nightmare disorder and PTSD-associated nightmares.[va +1]
Research does not promise identical results for everyone. Some studies find meaningful improvement in nightmare frequency, distress, sleep quality, and PTSD symptoms; others find smaller or mixed outcomes, especially among people with severe, chronic PTSD. That uncertainty is important. The responsible conclusion is not that dreamwork cures trauma. It is that intentional, supported work with dream imagery can be beneficial for some people and deserves serious consideration.[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih +2]
This matters because it validates a modest version of what I have experienced: a dream need not be obeyed, feared, or decoded as a supernatural message in order to become useful. It can be observed, written down, felt, questioned, reframed, and placed beside present-day life.
The potential benefit lies in turning an automatic experience into a conscious inquiry.
The Hypothesis of Reorientation
My working hypothesis is simple:

When a dream repeats an old emotional pattern in a new situation, waking reflection may help a person identify the pattern, separate past conditioning from present reality, and choose a less self-destructive response.

This is not an invitation to overinterpret every dream. It is an invitation to listen for emotional repetitions.
The questions that have helped me are uncomplicated:
• What was I trying to do in the dream?
• What feeling governed the scene?
• What did I fear would happen?
• What did I believe I had to do to remain safe, loved, or acceptable?
• Where does this same rule appear in my waking relationships?
• What would I want the adult self to offer the younger self who learned that rule?
• What one present action would express a different understanding?
The purpose is not to blame oneself for childhood adaptation. A child who becomes vigilant, pleasing, silent, detached, or excessively responsible is trying to survive emotionally. Such patterns deserve respect before they can change.
But survival is not the same as freedom.
The dream can become a private theater where the old rule is exposed: the need to appease, the fear of abandonment, the belief that love must be earned, the habit of disappearing before one’s needs become inconvenient. In waking life, one may then begin to build a different response: a boundary, a request, a pause, an act of self-trust, a refusal to chase what repeatedly wounds.
For me, this is not merely dream interpretation. It is a form of reorientation.
It is the slow recovery of an inner persona that was kept trapped—not because it lacked worth, but because it lacked enough room, witness, safety, and language to process what had happened. The work is to meet that former self with a mind that can now understand more, forgive more carefully, and live with greater authority.
Perhaps that is what healing sometimes is: not erasing the past, but refusing to let its old instructions remain the sole author of the future.


A Poem: “The Dream Asks Again”


What enters when the daylight thins,
And draws the old rooms into view?
A child still listening within,
To learn what fear once taught was true.
Why does the hallway have no end,
Why do I search for keys at night?
What broken message did I send,
To make myself become so slight?
A face appears, then fades away,
A door is shut without a sound;
Did I believe I had to stay,
Where love was never safely found?
I wake and ask the dream its name,
Not as a prophet or a judge;
Perhaps it holds an older flame,
That asks my heart to shift and budge.
What rule was written in my chest,
When no one helped me bear the storm?
Must I still fail the secret test,
Or can I give my life new form?
The dream is not a map of fact,
Nor proof of every wound I knew;
It is a stage where shadows act,
And show what old alarms still do.
Can I look back without retreat,
And name the fear without its reign?
Can I stand calmly on my feet,
And let the past unclose its chain?
I was not made to always hide,
Or beg for warmth I could not claim;
The child I was still lives inside,
But need not carry all the blame.
So let the dream return at dawn,
With questions I can meet awake;
From what was lost, a self is drawn,
And wiser roads are mine to make.

…

DCG


A Perspective, Not a Prescription
This essay offers a hypothesis rooted in personal experience, established trauma concepts, and limited but meaningful evidence from nightmare-focused therapies. It does not claim that all dreams are therapeutic, that all trauma can be resolved through dream reflection, or that anyone should force themselves into distressing material alone.
If dreams are recurrent, terrifying, sleep-disrupting, or accompanied by worsening anxiety, dissociation, depression, self-harm thoughts, substance escalation, or physical dream-enactment, professional support is warranted. A trauma-informed therapist, particularly one familiar with PTSD, CPTSD, nightmares, and imagery rehearsal therapy, can help make dream exploration safer and more structured.
Still, I believe there is a possibility worth considering.
For those of us who have spent years governed by unnamed patterns, the dream may offer a strange but usable gift: an image of the internal life that ordinary consciousness has learned to avoid. If we meet it gently in the morning—without superstition, without certainty, without self-condemnation—it may help us see what we have been carrying.
And once seen, what was automatic may become discussable.
What becomes discussable may become understandable.
What becomes understandable may, little by little, become changeable.

Sources and Further Reading
The following sources support the limited claims made in this essay: that sleep and dreaming are connected to emotional-memory processing; that trauma-related nightmares can reflect ongoing distress; and that structured waking work with nightmare imagery—especially Imagery Rehearsal Therapy—has evidence of benefit for some people. They do not establish that every dream has a fixed meaning or that dream reflection alone resolves trauma.

  1. Morgenthaler, Timothy I., et al. “Position Paper for the Treatment of Nightmare Disorder in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Position Paper.” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 14, no. 6, 2018, pp. 1041–1055.
    The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends Imagery Rehearsal Therapy for nightmare disorder and PTSD-associated nightmares. IRT involves revising a nightmare’s imagery while awake and rehearsing the revised version.[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih +1]
  2. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. “New Position Paper Recommends Treatment Options for Adult Nightmare Disorder.” 14 June 2018.
    A plain-language summary of the AASM position paper, including its recommendation of Imagery Rehearsal Therapy for nightmares associated with PTSD and nightmare disorder.[aasm]
  3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. “Sleep Problems in Veterans with PTSD.”
    Explains that Imagery Rehearsal Therapy, also called nightmare rescripting, involves changing the content of a recurring nightmare to make it less intense or distressing. The VA notes positive civilian trials while also acknowledging that results have been mixed in some veteran populations.[ptsd.va]
  4. Bishop, Thomas M., et al. “A Retrospective Pilot Study of Imagery Rehearsal Therapy for Trauma-Related Nightmares.” Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023.
    Reports preliminary evidence that a modified, single-session imagery-rehearsal intervention reduced nightmare frequency and intensity, nightmare-related distress, and PTSD symptoms in a veteran sample. As a pilot and retrospective study, its findings should be treated as promising rather than conclusive.[ncbi.nlm.nih]
  5. Casement, M. D., and L. M. Swanson. “A Meta-analysis of Imagery Rehearsal for Post-trauma Nightmares: Effects on Nightmare Frequency, Sleep Quality, and Posttraumatic Stress.” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 32, no. 6, 2012, pp. 566–574.
    A meta-analysis finding that imagery rehearsal was associated with substantial improvements in nightmare frequency, sleep quality, and PTSD symptoms, with benefits reported at follow-up.[nih]
  6. Hutchison, I. Claire, and colleagues. “Emotional Memory Processing During REM Sleep With Implications for PTSD.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2023.
    Reviews evidence that REM sleep plays a role in emotional and fear-memory processing and discusses how PTSD can involve recurring, emotionally charged dreams and disturbed sleep processes.[nih]
  7. Walker, Matthew P., and Robert Stickgold. “Sleep and Emotional Memory Processing.” Sleep Medicine Clinics, 2011.
    Reviews research connecting sleep with the processing and consolidation of emotional memories. This research supports the general proposition that sleep can be relevant to emotional processing; it does not assign a fixed meaning to an individual dream.[nih]
  8. Maté, Gabor. The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture. Avery, 2022.
    Maté’s central formulation—“Trauma is not what happens to you; trauma is what happens inside you as a result of what happens to you”—helps frame trauma as an enduring internal adaptation, not merely a past event.[cbc]
  9. Herman, Judith L. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books, revised edition, 2015.
    A foundational account of trauma recovery centered on safety, remembrance and mourning, and reconnection. Useful background for understanding why paced reflection and supportive relationships matter in recovery.
  10. van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking, 2014.
    Explores how trauma can shape bodily alarm, memory, emotion, and relational patterns, and discusses approaches to restoring present-day agency.
  11. Fisher, Janina. Healing the Fragmented Selves of Trauma Survivors: Overcoming Internal Self-Alienation. Routledge, 2017.
    A practical, trauma-informed account of understanding entrenched reactions as protective survival responses rather than character defects.
  12. Hartmann, Ernest. Dreams and Nightmares: The New Theory on the Origin and Meaning of Dreams. Plenum Press, 1998.
    Hartmann’s work is especially relevant to the idea that dreams may represent emotional concerns through images and metaphors rather than through literal replays of experience.
  13. Hill, Clara E. Dream Work in Therapy: Facilitating Exploration, Insight, and Action. American Psychological Association, 1996.
    Presents an integrative model for working with dreams in psychotherapy through exploration, insight, and practical waking-life action. The approach emphasizes the dreamer’s own associations rather than an authority imposing a universal symbolic interpretation.[marquette]
  14. Ullman, Montague, and Nan Zimmerman. Working with Dreams. Delacorte Press, 1979.
    A classic collaborative method of dream exploration that treats the dreamer as the final authority on a dream’s personal meaning.
  15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. PROVAYBLUE (Methylene Blue) Injection: Prescribing Information. Revised 2024.
    Included solely for the medication-safety note in this essay. FDA labeling warns that methylene blue may cause serious or fatal serotonin syndrome when used with serotonergic drugs or certain opioids. Any use of methylene blue should be reviewed with a qualified clinician or pharmacist who has a complete list of medications, supplements, and substances used.[fda +1]

Note to readers: This essay is a personal reflection and a hypothesis, not medical or mental-health advice. Dreams do not provide a certain diagnosis, recovered factual history, or one universal meaning. Anyone experiencing recurrent nightmares, severe distress, disrupted sleep, dissociation, or worsening trauma symptoms should consider working with a licensed, trauma-informed mental-health professional or sleep specialist.

Which child were you?

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

I wrote this poem for my brother!

Which Child Were You?


A letter to my brother, in nine quatrains
Same house, same table, same hard rules,
one father’s word, one mother’s hand —
and still no two of us grew up
inside the same small patch of land.
A stranger put it into words
this week, in language plain and low:
the one who shines, the one who’s blamed,
the one who fades so none will know.
I know which one of those was me.
I asked for nothing. I stayed small.
I learned that needing was a risk
and silence was the safest wall.
No hand was raised at me, no praise,
no punishment, no word, no name —
a boy who stood inside a doorway
hoping to be seen. I’m still the same.
And you — you took the harder start,
the word he used when you’d done no wrong,
the page that would not hold its letters.
I watched. I stayed quiet. All along.
Then something shifted. Years went on.
He made you room. He said your name.
The son who fought the page he’d fought —
and I stood outside, watching, again.
And Mother loved us. I believe it.
She also turned and looked away.
She never stood between us and him.
That is the hardest thing to say.
Our parents both are gone. The roles
they wrote have no one left to keep.
I love you, brother. We don’t talk.
The house is empty now. It sleeps.
So ask yourself — not me, yourself —
which of those children did you know?
And if you ever want to tell me,
I’m here. I have been. I won’t go.

CLG

…
DCG

No Child Ever Grows Up In The Same Home
The Narcissistic Family System, and Why You and Your Siblings See the World So Differently

No Child Ever Grows Up In The Same Home
The Narcissistic Family System, and Why You and Your Siblings See the World So Differently

I’ve been wondering for years why two people can grow up in the same house and turn out as completely different people. So I decided to do some research on narcissistic family systems to understand what’s actually going on here.
You and your siblings grew up in the same house. Same parents. Same dinner table. Same rules. So why do you see the world so differently?
That’s because no child ever grows up in the same house.
Psychologist Judith Rich Harris found that no two children in the same family actually grow up in the same environment. Birth order, economic changes, and the age of the parents at different points in their lives means completely different childhoods can happen under one roof.
But in a narcissistic authoritarian household, something else also happens.
A narcissistic authoritarian parent is not just difficult or selfish. They’re someone who rules the family through fear, control, and punishment. Their word is law. Questioning them is not allowed. Disagreeing with them is dangerous.
The family learns one rule above all else: go along to get along, or you’re going to face the consequences.
Love in this household is conditional. It is a reward for compliance. Obedience buys you safety. Disobedience gets you punished. And the punishment is not just from the parent — the whole family learns to enforce the punishment, because they don’t want to become the next target.
The parent does not raise children. They manage them. Each child gets assigned a role based on one thing: how useful they are to that parent’s ego and control. And once that role is assigned, the entire family system works to enforce it forever.
Here are the three childhood roles a narcissistic authoritarian family needs in order to function.
One: The Golden Child
The golden child is the one who always seemed to have it easier. More praise, more protection, more forgiveness when things went wrong. Every achievement got celebrated. Every failure got explained away.
From the outside it looks like love. From the inside it was a transaction.
Psychologist Karyl McBride, author of the book Will I Ever Be Good Enough?, spent decades studying narcissistic family systems. She called this the golden child dynamic. The child is not loved for who they are. They are loved for what they perform — for how well they make the parent look good.
So they learn the game early. Stay close to power. Follow the rules. Report back to the parent. And when someone steps out of line, make sure the parent knows about it.
They are the hallway monitors. The ones who tell the teacher when someone is running in the hallway, and then smile when the kid gets in trouble.
At first they do it to survive. Siding with the authority figure means safety. Enforcing the rules means approval. Watching someone else get punished means they’re not the one getting punished.
What starts as survival becomes their identity. They stop just enforcing the rules to stay safe. They start enjoying it. They learn to love watching people get punished. They get a rush from being on the side doing the hurting. They become the bully — not just the bully’s assistant.
Dr. Ramani Durvasula, clinical psychologist and professor at California State University, Los Angeles, found that golden children frequently develop narcissistic traits as adults. Entitled, unable to empathize, convinced the rules exist for everyone but them. They grow up becoming the abuser, the controlling partner, the abusive boss — the parent who starts the whole cycle over again with their own children.

And because cruelty feels like safety in that house, cruelty feels like safety everywhere they go. When a powerful person mocks someone, humiliates someone, punishes someone who stepped out of line, their brain does not feel disgust. It feels comfort. It feels familiar. It feels like home.
That is why they’re drawn to bullies. That is why they become the bully’s most loyal defender. When someone powerful mocks a weaker person or humiliates an opponent, they don’t look away. They cheer. Because their childhood taught them that this is what power looks like — and power is the only thing that ever kept them safe.
They are the most susceptible people in the family to any authoritarian figure who comes along. And the cycle continues through them into the next generation.
Two: The Forgotten Child
The forgotten child never got targeted. They got something worse. They got ignored.
No praise. No punishment. No attention of any kind. They were simply not useful enough to bother with. The parent was too busy performing for the golden child and punishing the black sheep to notice them at all.
Not consciously, but systematically, they made themselves invisible. They stopped asking for things, stopped making noise, stopped having needs that might draw attention. They faded into the walls of the house and learned to survive on nothing.
Psychologist Karyl McBride identified the lost child as the most neglected and overlooked role in the family. By the time these children are adults, they often cannot tell what they want, what they feel, or what they need — because nobody ever asked them.
That type of neglect hollows a person out. They grow up believing that they don’t matter, that their needs are inconvenient, that wanting things is selfish, that the safest version of themselves is the smallest one.
As adults, forgotten children gravitate toward partners who ignore them. Bosses who overlook them. Friendships where they give everything and receive nothing back. Not because they enjoy it, but because it feels like the only kind of relationship they know how to be in.
They are the ones who checked out entirely. Not because they don’t care, but because they learned that engaging with anything powerful gets you noticed — and getting noticed was always dangerous.
What they want most in the world is for someone to finally notice them. And they’re still waiting.
Three: The Black Sheep
If you grew up in a toxic household, you know what this means. You were the target. The scapegoat.
Authoritarian family systems require three roles. The enforcer, which is the authoritarian parent. The loyalists, which are the golden children — they conform and are trained to be instantly obedient. And the scapegoat: someone to blame when things go wrong.
The black sheep was the one they picked on. The one who was always wrong. The one who was always too sensitive, always the problem.
The psychiatrist Murray Bowen at Georgetown University spent decades studying how families assign roles to maintain their dysfunction. He found that authoritarian households need a scapegoat to function. They need someone to dump all their dysfunction onto so everyone else can pretend that everything is fine.
So you become the person who is blamed for everything. The parent trained other family members that if you got punished, it was acceptable for them to join in. They ganged up on you. They learned that hurting you got rewarded.
So you were not just dealing with one toxic parent. At times it was the whole family. Because if they didn’t join in, they became the target as well. Nobody wants to get hurt. Nobody wants to feel like they don’t belong. So they participated. They became complicit. The loyalty test got enforced on everyone in that house.
And they didn’t pick you because you were weak. They picked you because you had things that threatened their system. The empathy for others, which they saw as weakness. Curiosity that threatened their control. The ability to question things they needed to crush.

They tried to hurt you until you complied. Till they broke you. But you never did.
Psychologist Bessel van der Kolk at Boston University spent decades studying what happens to children who grow up in threatening environments. They develop a trauma response where their brain never stops scanning for threats, lies, and manipulation. He called it hypervigilance.
Hypervigilant people watch for inconsistencies. They look for real motives behind what people say. Because when you were a kid, if you didn’t, you got hurt. Hypervigilant people learned that lesson before they were old enough to understand what was happening.
So when someone like that turns up in your adult life — a boss, a partner, a person with a platform — you recognize them immediately. Not as a leader, but as an abuser. The gaslighting, the lying, the cruelty, the need to dominate and humiliate. The demand for unconditional loyalty. It was your family all over again. The black sheep already learned how to survive people just like that.
Some black sheep do not make it out. The weight of being hated by the people who are supposed to love you is not a small thing. It breaks most people. Some spend a lifetime being called weak by the parent who assigned them the role, mocked in public, with the rest of the family joining in. Some drink themselves to death long before old age.
This is what happens when a black sheep never escapes the family system. When they stay close to the family that’s abusing them, the abuse follows them everywhere they go, and they never find their way out.
But some black sheep do escape. And the black sheep who make it through carry something no one else in the family has. That hypervigilance. The brain that never stops scanning, never stops watching, never stops looking for the gap between what someone says and what they actually mean.
It’s both a blessing and a curse. It’s exhausting to live with, but it makes the person impossible to manipulate.
The black sheep was not the problem in the house. They were the only one telling the truth.
Three Children, Three Different Childhoods
The golden child is still performing. Still siding with whoever promises to protect them from the people they were taught to fear. Still becoming the abuser in every room they walk into.
The forgotten child is still disappearing. Still waiting for someone to finally notice them. Still accepting less than they deserve.
And the black sheep is still being told they are the problem — and they’re still the most impossible person in the room to manipulate.
Three children. Same house. Same parents. Three completely different childhoods. Three completely different adults.
The narcissistic parent spent years trying to break the black sheep. Instead, they created the one person in the family who will never be controlled again.

And that’s how the cycle ends. 

—

Source

Source
This transcript comes from a video monologue by writer Lucas Bean, published May 23, 2026:
• Video: Did You Grow Up In A Narcissistic Family? (9:53)
• Written version: No Child Ever Grows Up In The Same Home, Lucas Bean Daily on Substack
The works Bean cites in his written version:
• Judith Rich Harris, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do (Free Press, 1998)
• Alice Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child (1979)
• Karyl McBride, Will I Ever Be Good Enough? Healing the Daughters of Narcissistic Mothers (Free Press, 2008)
• Ramani Durvasula, Should I Stay or Should I Go: Surviving a Relationship with a Narcissist (Post Hill Press, 2015)
• Murray Bowen, Family Therapy in Clinical Practice (Jason Aronson, 1978)
• Robin Stern, The Gaslight Effect (Morgan Road Books, 2007)
• Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score (Viking, 2014)
Editor’s note on the attributions
Three corrections, made silently in the transcript above or noted here, for anyone who wants to follow the research:
Judith Rich Harris was not at Rutgers University. The spoken version of this monologue credits her to Rutgers. She held no academic post at all — she was an independent researcher who wrote The Nurture Assumption from her home in New Jersey after being dismissed from Harvard’s psychology PhD program decades earlier. That is part of what made the book notorious. The affiliation has been dropped from the transcript above; Bean’s own written version makes no such claim.
The author of Will I Ever Be Good Enough? is Karyl McBride, not “Carol.” Spoken as “Carol” twice in the video; corrected above to match Bean’s own citation.

Van der Kolk did not coin “hypervigilance.” The monologue says “he called it hypervigilance,” but the term was established clinical vocabulary long before The Body Keeps the Score — it appears in the PTSD criteria of the DSM-III in 1980. Van der Kolk popularized the trauma framework the clip describes; he did not name the symptom.
The remaining affiliations check out: Ramani Durvasula is a professor at California State University, Los Angeles; Murray Bowen founded the family systems program at Georgetown; Bessel van der Kolk is a professor of psychiatry at Boston University.

The coat I wore too long

~ DC ~ Leave a comment

The Coat I Wore Too Long


I was a child who learned to read a room,
to hear a door and know which way to turn.
I made myself small enough for the gloom,
and called it love, because I had to learn.
Nobody struck a match, no headline came,
no siren marked the night my trust grew thin.
The wound was quiet, it never took a name —
it did not happen to me, but within.
So I grew clever in the art of gone:
I turned the world to static, soft and gray.
When I could not fight back, I carried on
by leaving while my body had to stay.
That trick was meant to last a single year,
a borrowed coat to wear until the spring.
But coats grow into skin when worn in fear,
and what began a state became a thing.
They cut the mind from body in their books,
and filed my aching under nothing found.
But flesh remembers everything it took,
and hearts keep time with every slamming sound.
One shout, one raised hand — watch how fast I change:
the stomach stops, the blood runs to the hand.
And know this runs all day, quiet and strange,
in rooms no careful doctor understands.
I used to think my troubles came by chance,
a run of weather, luck that wouldn’t hold.
But every wall was there to break the trance,
and every ache was something being told.
The part of me that loved me most of all
had built those roadblocks so that I would see.
It did not come to watch me rise or fall —
it came to walk me back, at last, to me.
So if you read this wearing borrowed walls,
know nothing in you broke that can’t be known.
The coping kept you breathing through the halls —
you may set it down now. You are not alone.
…
DCG

In the realm of child development, I just wish we’d actually looked at the evidence. But we don’t.
I was in family practice for 32 years — 12 of them with hardcore drug addicts, the other 20 in a straightforward family practice. And in those years I found that the people who got sick and didn’t get sick had certain patterns.
There’s one major source of illness, and I’m talking about any kind of illness, whether that’s so-called mental illness or physical illness. And that’s childhood trauma. Trauma is what happens inside you as a result of what happens to you. And things can happen inside you for which you don’t need very dramatic events.


Growing scientific evidence demonstrates that social and physical environments that threaten human development — because of scarcity, stress, or instability — can lead to short-term physiologic and psychological adjustments that are necessary for immediate survival and adaptation, but which may come at a significant cost to long-term outcomes in learning, behavior, health, and longevity.
Because those early coping patterns — here’s the problem with them: they’re meant to be temporary states. If you’re familiar with my idea about ADHD, which I’ve been diagnosed with, it’s a coping mechanism of young infants. When there’s stress around them and they can’t escape, fight back, or change the situation, they tune out as a way of coping. But then it gets wired into the brain, and now it goes from a temporary state, which it’s meant to be, to a long-term trait.
There’s nothing wrong with her coping that way if she could drop it once she no longer needed to be that way. But of course, that’s not how it works. These coping mechanisms are unconscious. Therefore they’re not chosen deliberately, therefore they cannot be released deliberately either. We’re not even aware of them.
The reason these patterns make you ill is because it turns out that, as traditional medicinal practices have always known, you can’t actually separate the mind from the body. Except in medical school. But not in real life.


Now, Western medicine looks at disease from a particular perspective. And you have to understand something about medicine. It’s science, alright, but it’s also ideology. Now, there’s a difference between science and ideology. An ideology is a worldview that you’re not conscious of, where you have hidden beliefs that you don’t question. And that exists in all realms — whether it’s science, or politics, or history, or economics, or any field of human thought or investigation. So there’s always ideological biases hidden in any system.


Now, what are the biases of Western medicine? Well, the hidden biases are, number one, that diseases have either physical causes in the sense of genes, or external forces like bacteria or viruses or toxins — or the disease is what we call idiopathic, we don’t know what the cause of it is.
The first bias is that causes are purely physical. The second bias is that diseases happen to organs. So you have heart disease, and you have lung disease, and you have diseases of connective tissue or the liver or whatever. And then there are specialties designated to study in depth the diseases of these organs. So we separate the organ from the whole person.
We might acknowledge the role of the physical environment, but we certainly don’t acknowledge the role of the social environment. So, I could clearly and trivially change your physiology in a split second. I simply would have to utter a piercing, blood-curdling scream and brandish a weapon at you. And your physiology would change like that. Your hormonal glands would start behaving differently, your intestines would stop digesting, more blood would flow to your muscles, and you’d be ready for flight or fight.


Now that’s an obvious example where the emotion changes the physiology in a split second. Well, guess what — that goes on 24/7. So that interaction between the physiology and the emotions is constant. It’s just that for the most part we’re not aware of it unless it’s dramatic.
In general, the role of the emotions is to invite in what is nurturing and welcome and healthy, and to keep out that which is unwelcome, dangerous, and toxic. So with some people, some of the time, we will invite even greater proximity. And others, we would never want to be anywhere close to them. That’s the job of our emotions — to maintain those boundaries.
Your conflicts, all the difficult things, the problematic situations in your life are not chance or haphazard. They’re specifically yours, designed specifically for you by a part of you that loves you more than anything else. The part of you that loves you more than anything else has created roadblocks to lead you to yourself.
We can look at psychological problems, relationship conflicts, and illness as just problems to get rid of. Or we could look upon them as opportunities for learning and development and growth. You don’t say to somebody just diagnosed with cancer, “Hey, great, this is a great teaching moment.” But if somebody wants to learn, if they start asking why, it’s a powerful teacher.
And contrary to what my profession believes — that these diseases have a life of their own, separate from the individual — they don’t. They’re processes inside people, and the people have the response-ability to affect those processes once they get it and they drop the automatic patterns that have been driving them.

—Dr. Gabor Mate

The physiological roots of illness

Sustainable human